'Civility' and the Civilizing Project.
Calls for civility have been on the rise recently, as have presumptions that civility is both an academic virtue and a prerequisite for rational engagement and discussion among those who disagree. One imperative of epistemic decolonization is to unmask the ways that familiar conceptual resources are...
| Publicado en: | Philosophical Papers Vol. 49; no. 2; pp. 305 - 338 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jul2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=146393704&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 146393704 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 05568641 273E jtl: Philosophical Papers issn: 05568641 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2020 vid: 49 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 146393704 10.1080/05568641.2020.1780148 ppf: 305 ppct: 33 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 309KB tig: atl: 'Civility' and the Civilizing Project. aug: au: Berenstain, Nora affil: University of Tennessee su: Courtesy Imperialism Indigenous peoples Decolonization sug: subj: Courtesy Imperialism Indigenous peoples Decolonization ab: Calls for civility have been on the rise recently, as have presumptions that civility is both an academic virtue and a prerequisite for rational engagement and discussion among those who disagree. One imperative of epistemic decolonization is to unmask the ways that familiar conceptual resources are produced within and function to uphold a settler colonial epistemological framework. I argue that rhetorical deployments of 'civility' uphold settler colonialism by obscuring the systematic production of state violence against marginalized populations and Indigenous peoples, relying on the colonial conceptual framework of 'civilized' vs 'savage', and excusing death-promoting rhetoric under the guise of liberal disagreement. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophical Papers is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophical Papers holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|