Utilising Poetry Dynamic Criteria Mapping (PDCM) to analyse how comparable liberal arts institutions evaluate poetry.

In We Need To Talk: A New Method for Evaluating Poetry (2018), Michael Theune and Bob Broad present a study that uses a version of their 'Poetry Dynamic Criteria Mapping' (PDCM) methodology to empirically and inductively investigate the implicit criteria in the selection of poems in creative arts jo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice & Theory of Creative Writing Vol. 17; no. 4; pp. 443 - 463
Autor principal: Kauerauf, Abigail
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Nov2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:In We Need To Talk: A New Method for Evaluating Poetry (2018), Michael Theune and Bob Broad present a study that uses a version of their 'Poetry Dynamic Criteria Mapping' (PDCM) methodology to empirically and inductively investigate the implicit criteria in the selection of poems in creative arts journals. I employ a version of PDCM in my study. I coded and analysed 752 poems from the past three years' issues of nine creative arts journals from liberal arts institutions in the same academic conference. Two important patterns emerged: (1) the vast majority of the poems are outgrowths of confessional poetry: free verse, serious, introspective, and focused on emotion; and (2) few poems seem aligned with other values, including those espoused by avant-garde, slam, and socially and politically engaged poetry.