ON CICERO'S FABIUS ARGUMENT.
This article aims to show that it is impossible to put Cicero's testimonies regarding The Fabius Argument in a consistent inferential order. Either we must suppose that additional premises are tacitly assumed in the text or we must compare it with other sources, which leads to inconsistencies in the...
| Publicado en: | Filozofia Vol. 75; no. 8; pp. 677 - 693 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Filozofia
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=146644008&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 146644008 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0046385X 1VQE jtl: Filozofia issn: 0046385X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2020 vid: 75 iid: 8 pid: 55711 pub: Filozofia artinfo: ui: 146644008 10.31577/filozofia.2020.75.8.5 ppf: 677 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.7MB tig: atl: ON CICERO'S FABIUS ARGUMENT. aug: au: MARKO, VLADIMÍR affil: Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Philosophy, Bratislava, Slovakia su: Cicero, Marcus Tullius, 106 B.C.-43 B.C. Legal evidence Argument Legal testimony Opponents Modal logic sug: subj: Cicero, Marcus Tullius, 106 B.C.-43 B.C. Legal evidence Argument Legal testimony Opponents Modal logic keyword: Cicero Conditional Connectedness Incompatibility Modality Paraconditional Stoic logic The Fabius argument ab: This article aims to show that it is impossible to put Cicero's testimonies regarding The Fabius Argument in a consistent inferential order. Either we must suppose that additional premises are tacitly assumed in the text or we must compare it with other sources, which leads to inconsistencies in the proof's reconstruction. Cicero's reconstruction of the progression of the argument has formal shortcomings, and the paper draws attention to some of these deficiencies. He interpreted sources in a revised and intentionally simplified way, with the aim of undermining the views of his opponents, casting them as inconsistent and similar to views held by Diodorus. Rather than being a consistently interpreted argument faithfully transcribed from the Stoic sources, Cicero's Fabius Argument is ultimately anti-Stoic. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Filozofia is the property of Filozofia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Filozofia holder: Filozofia dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|