The Structure and Dynamics Argument against Materialism Revisited.
Alter (2016) elaborates and defends an ambitious argument advanced by Chalmers (2002) against physicalism. As Alter notes, the argument is valid. But I will argue that not all its premises are true. In particular, it is false that all physical truths are purely structural. In denying this, I focus n...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 98; pp. 136 - 141 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=146644091&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 146644091 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2020 vid: 98 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 146644091 10.15388/Problemos.98.12 ppf: 136 ppct: 5 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 820KB tig: atl: The Structure and Dynamics Argument against Materialism Revisited. aug: au: Mărăşoiu, Andrei affil: The Research Institute, University of Bucharest su: Argument Materialism Truth sug: subj: Argument Materialism Truth keyword: a priori entailment dualism explanatory gap physicalism structural truths the structure and dynamics argument thought-experiments a priori sąlygojimas aiškinimo plyšys dualizmas fizikalizmas mintiniai eksperimentai struktūrinės tiesos struktūros ir dinamikos argumentas ab: Alter (2016) elaborates and defends an ambitious argument advanced by Chalmers (2002) against physicalism. As Alter notes, the argument is valid. But I will argue that not all its premises are true. In particular, it is false that all physical truths are purely structural. In denying this, I focus not on the objects of pure physical theory but on the homely, macroscopic objects of our daily lives. Alteris (2016) papildo ir gina ambicingą Chalmerso (2002) teiginį, nukreiptą prieš fizikalizmą. Anot Alterio, šis argumentas yra galiojantis. Bet šiame straipsnyje teigiama, kad ne visos šio argumento prielaidos yra teisingos. Norima pabrėžti, kad prielaida, esą visos fizinės tiesos grynai struktūrinės, yra klaidinga. Paneigiant šias prielaidas, straipsnyje susitelkiama ne į grynos fizinės teorijos objektus, bet į mūsų kasdienybę ženklinančius ir mums artimus, makroskopinius objektus. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|