Valuing animals as they are—Whether they feel it or not.

Dressing up animals in ridiculous costumes, shaming dogs on the internet, playing Big Buck Hunter at the local tavern, feeding vegan food to cats, and producing and consuming "knockout" animals, what, if anything, do these acts have in common? In this article, I develop two respect‐based arguments t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Philosophy Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 770 - 789
Autor principal: Abbate, C.E.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=146649488&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 146649488
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09668373
        7PU
      jtl: European Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 09668373
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2020
      vid: 28
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        146649488
        10.1111/ejop.12521
      ppf: 770
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.6MB
      tig:
        atl: Valuing animals as they are—Whether they feel it or not.
      aug:
        au: Abbate, C.E.
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Nevada,
      su:
        Costume
        Animals
        Animal welfare
        Internet
        Veganism
      sug:
        subj:
          Costume
          Animals
          Animal welfare
          Internet
          Veganism
      ab: Dressing up animals in ridiculous costumes, shaming dogs on the internet, playing Big Buck Hunter at the local tavern, feeding vegan food to cats, and producing and consuming "knockout" animals, what, if anything, do these acts have in common? In this article, I develop two respect‐based arguments that explain how these acts are morally problematic, even though they might not always, if ever, affect the experiential welfare of animals. While these acts are not ordinary wrongs, they are animal dignitary wrongs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of European Journal of Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: European Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N