The Inner-Workings of Collaboration in Environmental Management and Governance: A Systematic Mapping Review.
Collaboration has taken centre stage in addressing complex environmental issues and yet several voids are evident in our understanding of it. A systematic mapping review was conducted to synthesize knowledge about the inner workings of collaboration (qualities, outcomes, and their relationship(s)) i...
| Publicado en: | Environmental Management Vol. 66; no. 5; pp. 801 - 816 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Nov2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=146652429&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 146652429 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 0364152X O5H jtl: Environmental Management issn: 0364152X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2020 vid: 66 iid: 5 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 146652429 144839739 10.1007/s00267-020-01337-x 146652429 ppf: 801 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: The Inner-Workings of Collaboration in Environmental Management and Governance: A Systematic Mapping Review. aug: au: Feist, Alison Plummer, Ryan Baird, Julia affil: Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, L2S 3A1, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada sug: ab: Collaboration has taken centre stage in addressing complex environmental issues and yet several voids are evident in our understanding of it. A systematic mapping review was conducted to synthesize knowledge about the inner workings of collaboration (qualities, outcomes, and their relationship(s)) in environmental management and governance scholarship. Eighty-five scholarly works were included in the review and the analysis revealed 27 qualities, 20 outcomes, and 104 relationships. The frequency and magnitude of each were established through multiple rounds of coding, surfacing their relative prominence in the literature. Collaborative qualities with the greatest prominence included trust building, social learning, dialogue, and active involvement; the most prominent outcomes included social learning and social capital. Descriptive analyses illuminated myriad relationships among collaborative qualities to achieve outcomes, and emphasized the role of collaborative qualities of lesser scholarly attention on achieving outcomes. Findings offer insight for individuals engaging in collaboration and for future work aiming to further explore collaboration. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|