Building capacity in dissemination and implementation science: a systematic review of the academic literature on teaching and training initiatives.
Background: The field of dissemination and implementation (D&I) science has grown significantly over recent years. Alongside this, an increased demand for training in D&I from researchers and implementers has been seen. Research describing and evaluating D&I training opportunities, referred to here...
| Publicado en: | Implementation Science Vol. 15; no. 1 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
BioMed Central
10/30/2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=146733163&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 146733163 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17485908 38MN jtl: Implementation Science issn: 17485908 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 10/30/2020 vid: 15 iid: 1 pid: 24147 pub: BioMed Central artinfo: ui: 146733163 146733163 NLM33126909 146733163 10.1186/s13012-020-01051-6 NLM33126909 146733163 ppct: 1 formats: tig: atl: Building capacity in dissemination and implementation science: a systematic review of the academic literature on teaching and training initiatives. aug: au: Davis, Rachel D'Lima, Danielle affil: Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK sug: subj: Organizational Development Organizations Human Research Personnel Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire Clinical Assessment Tools ab: Background: The field of dissemination and implementation (D&I) science has grown significantly over recent years. Alongside this, an increased demand for training in D&I from researchers and implementers has been seen. Research describing and evaluating D&I training opportunities, referred to here as 'capacity building initiatives' (CBIs), can help provide an understanding of different methods of training as well as training successes and challenges. However, to gain a more detailed understanding of the evidence-base and how D&I CBIs are being reported in publications, a field-wide examination of the academic literature is required.Methods: Systematic review to identify the type and range of D&I CBIs discussed and/or appraised in the academic literature. EMBASE, Medline and PsycINFO were searched between January 2006 and November 2019. Articles were included if they reported on a D&I CBI that was developed by the authors (of each of the included articles) or the author's host institution. Two reviewers independently screened the articles and extracted data using a standardised form.Results: Thirty-one articles (from a total of 4181) were included. From these, 41 distinct D&I CBIs were identified which focussed on different contexts and professions, from 8 countries across the world. CBIs ranged from short courses to training institutes to being part of academic programmes. Nearly half were delivered face-face with the remainder delivered remotely or using a blended format. CBIs often stipulated specific eligibility criteria, strict application processes and/or were oversubscribed. Variabilities in the way in which the D&I CBIs were reported and/or evaluated were evident.Conclusions: Increasing the number of training opportunities, as well as broadening their reach (to a wider range of learners), would help address the recognised deficit in D&I training. Standardisation in the reporting of D&I CBIs would enable the D&I community to better understand the findings across different contexts and scientific professions so that training gaps can be identified and overcome. More detailed examination of publications on D&I CBIs as well as the wider literature on capacity building would be of significant merit to the field. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|