GROUNDING RELIGIOUS TOLERATION: KANT AND WOLFF ON DOGMATIC CONFLICT.

This article examines Paul Guyer's claim that we should attempt to ground the principle of religious freedom on the basis of Kant's arguments for religious liberty. I problematise Guyer's suggestion by investigating a hypothetical 'dogmatic conflict' between a scientifically and a religiously ground...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy Vol. 17; no. 65; pp. 12 - 32
Main Author: Jakušić, Dino
Format: Article
Published: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy 2020
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=146743239&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 146743239
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17335566
        77X1
      jtl: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 17335566
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2020
      vid: 17
      iid: 65
      pid: 49926
      pub: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy
    artinfo:
      ui:
        146743239
        10.33392/diam.1559
      ppf: 12
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.6MB
      tig:
        atl: GROUNDING RELIGIOUS TOLERATION: KANT AND WOLFF ON DOGMATIC CONFLICT.
      aug:
        au: Jakušić, Dino
        affil: Department of Philosophy University of Warwick Coventry, CV4 7AL United Kingdom
      su: Freedom of religion
      sug:
        subj: Freedom of religion
      keyword:
        Christian Wolff
        dogmas
        dogmatic conflict
        Immanuel Kant
        Moses Mendelssohn
        Paul Guyer
        religious liberty
      ab: This article examines Paul Guyer's claim that we should attempt to ground the principle of religious freedom on the basis of Kant's arguments for religious liberty. I problematise Guyer's suggestion by investigating a hypothetical 'dogmatic conflict' between a scientifically and a religiously grounded belief. I further suggest that considering Christian Wolff's philosophy might provide us with an approach which shares the benefits that Guyer identifies in Kant, while at the same time avoiding the issues Kant might run into that result from the occurrence of the dogmatic conflict. I start by providing a background to Wolff's philosophy and explaining the notion of the dogmatic conflict. Then I present a potential contemporary case of the dogmatic conflict and try to see how it would be dealt with based on Guyer's proposal. Finally, I consider what a Wolffi an solution would look like, arguing that Guyer's project might benefi t from considering Wolff.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy is the property of Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N