From antagonist to protagonist: 'Democracy' and 'people' in British parliamentary debates, 1775–1885.

'Democracy' is a central word of our current political lexicon, often defined as 'the power of the people'. However, in 19th century Britain, 'democracy' was not characterized by the rule of the 'people' but by the power of lower classes, of the 'populace' and the 'mob'. In political discourse, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Digital Scholarship in the Humanities Vol. 35; no. 4; pp. 759 - 776
Autor principal: Bonin, Hugo
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Dec2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=146804853&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 146804853
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2055768X
        JEO9
      jtl: Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
      issn: 2055768X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2020
      vid: 35
      iid: 4
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        146804853
        10.1093/llc/fqz082
      ppf: 759
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 653KB
      tig:
        atl: From antagonist to protagonist: 'Democracy' and 'people' in British parliamentary debates, 1775–1885.
      aug:
        au: Bonin, Hugo
        affil: Department of Political Science, Université du Québec à Montréal , QC, Canada
      su:
        Corpora
        Debate
        Democracy
        Eighteenth century
        British history
        United Kingdom
      sug:
        subj:
          United Kingdom
          Corpora
          Debate
          Democracy
          Eighteenth century
          British history
      ab: 'Democracy' is a central word of our current political lexicon, often defined as 'the power of the people'. However, in 19th century Britain, 'democracy' was not characterized by the rule of the 'people' but by the power of lower classes, of the 'populace' and the 'mob'. In political discourse, and especially in parliamentary debates, the 'people' were an antagonist of 'democracy', not its protagonist. To support these statements, this article analyses British parliamentary debates between 1775 and 1885, through both a 'distant reading' with the help of corpus linguistics tools and a closer examination of certain key debates and actors. After a brief overview of the methodology, three crucial periods of British political history are analysed. (1) The end of the 18th century, where the impact of the French Revolution on democratic vocabulary is measured. (2) The debates surrounding the 1832 Reform Act, in which the explicit differentiation between the constitutional 'people' and the democratic 'mob' is drawn out by Whigs and Tories alike. (3) The Second Reform Act (1867), also presented as a 'popular' measure, and not a step towards 'democracy'. In conclusion, the adoption of the democratic vocabulary by British Members of Parliament is traced to the 1880s, notably with the emergence of the idea of 'Tory democracy'.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: © 2019 EADH: The European Association for Digital Humanities.
      item: Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
      holder: Oxford University Press / USA
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N