Comparative Reliability Assessment of Tooth Volume Measurement with Different Three-Dimensional Imaging Software.
Objective. To evaluate the in vivo tooth volume through VRMesh and 3Matic programs and to compare the measurements to the physical volume. So, the aim of the study was to ensure the reliability and sensitivity of the three-dimensional software (VRMesh and 3Matic) in measuring tooth volume. Material...
| Publicado en: | BioMed Research International pp. 1 - 13 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | diagnostic images pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
11/7/2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=146889928&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 146889928 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 23146133 FT2T jtl: BioMed Research International issn: 23146133 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 11/7/2020 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 146889928 146889928 146889928 10.1155/2020/5870472 146889928 ppf: 1 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Comparative Reliability Assessment of Tooth Volume Measurement with Different Three-Dimensional Imaging Software. aug: au: Rasheed, Tara Ali Shehab Al Hamdany, Afrah Khazal Rauf, Aras Maruf affil: Department of Pedodontics, Orthodontics, and Prevention, College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani-shorsh 67/4, Kurdistan Region, Iraq sug: subj: Imaging, Three-Dimensional Methods Software Tooth Anatomy and Histology Measurement Issues and Assessments Reliability Sensitivity and Specificity Human In Vivo Studies In Vitro Studies Analysis of Variance Descriptive Statistics Validity ab: Objective. To evaluate the in vivo tooth volume through VRMesh and 3Matic programs and to compare the measurements to the physical volume. So, the aim of the study was to ensure the reliability and sensitivity of the three-dimensional software (VRMesh and 3Matic) in measuring tooth volume. Material and Methods. The volume of 26 extracted upper first premolars from orthodontic patients who had CBCT before orthodontic treatment were measured. Two different commercial programs, which were VRMesh and 3Matic, were used to calculate the volume of the segmented upper first premolar from CBCT. The in vivo tooth volume was compared to the physical tooth volume to examine the accuracy of the two software in measuring the tooth volume. Results. The difference between the mean of the in vivo and in vitro tooth volume measurements was too small, making it clinically nonsignificant. ANOVA test was used as a statistical tool, and no statistically significant difference was noticed among the measurements. The values were normally distributed when tested for normality by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk test. P value less than or equal to 0.05 (P ≤ 0.05) was considered statistically significant. Conclusion. The assessment of the in vivo tooth volume measurement with different three-dimensional imaging software (VRMesh and 3Matic) programs in comparison with the tooth physical volume is reliable. The use of a mouse pen during the refining stage of the segmentation may have increased the accuracy of the procedure. The determined in vivo tooth volumes are dependable and can be applied in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: diagnostic images pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|