Comparisons of Auditory Brainstem Responses Between a Laboratory and Simulated Home Environment.
Purpose: Miniaturization of digital technologies has created new opportunities for remote health care and neuroscientific fieldwork. The current study assesses comparisons between in-home auditory brainstem response (ABR) recordings and recordings obtained in a traditional lab setting. Method: Click...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 63; no. 11; pp. 3877 - 3893 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Nov2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=147015953&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 147015953 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10924388 1SM jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research issn: 10924388 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2020 vid: 63 iid: 11 pid: 42 pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association artinfo: ui: 147015953 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00383 ppf: 3877 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.7MB tig: atl: Comparisons of Auditory Brainstem Responses Between a Laboratory and Simulated Home Environment. aug: au: Parker, Ashley Slack, Candace Skoe, Erika affil: Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs Connecticut Institute for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs su: Connecticut Home environment Brain stem Comparative studies Statistical correlation Laboratories Data analysis software Descriptive statistics sug: subj: Home environment Connecticut Testing Laboratories Medical Laboratories Veterinary Services Brain stem Comparative studies Statistical correlation Laboratories Data analysis software Descriptive statistics ab: Purpose: Miniaturization of digital technologies has created new opportunities for remote health care and neuroscientific fieldwork. The current study assesses comparisons between in-home auditory brainstem response (ABR) recordings and recordings obtained in a traditional lab setting. Method: Click-evoked and speech-evoked ABRs were recorded in 12 normal-hearing, young adult participants over three test sessions in (a) a shielded sound booth within a research lab, (b) a simulated home environment, and (c) the research lab once more. The same single-family house was used for all home testing. Results: Analyses of ABR latencies, a common clinical metric, showed high repeatability between the home and lab environments across both the click-evoked and speech-evoked ABRs. Like ABR latencies, response consistency and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were robust both in the lab and in the home and did not show significant differences between locations, although variability between the home and lab was higher than latencies, with two participants influencing this lower repeatability between locations. Response consistency and SNR also patterned together, with a trend for higher SNRs to pair with more consistent responses in both the home and lab environments. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of obtaining high-quality ABR recordings within a simulated home environment that closely approximate those recorded in a more traditional recording environment. This line of work may open doors to greater accessibility to underserved clinical and research populations. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|