The Historiography of China's "Rise": A Struggle for Narrative Autonomy in IR Theory.

The story of International Relations (IR) has always been recounted with a language endemic to the Anglo-liberal political and international experience. This vernacular depicts all states as self-interested expansionists seeking to either promote or antagonise the liberal international order. To adv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Asian Studies Review Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 671 - 691
Autores principales: Wilde, Jarrett T., Xing, Yue
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Dec2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=147102227&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 147102227
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10357823
        SDR
      jtl: Asian Studies Review
      issn: 10357823
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2020
      vid: 44
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        147102227
        10.1080/10357823.2020.1746742
      ppf: 671
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.3MB
      tig:
        atl: The Historiography of China's "Rise": A Struggle for Narrative Autonomy in IR Theory.
      aug:
        au:
          Wilde, Jarrett T.
          Xing, Yue
        affil: Tsinghua University
      su:
        Historiography
        International relations
        Pluralism
        Narratives
        Ontology
        China
      sug:
        subj:
          China
          Historiography
          International relations
          Pluralism
          Narratives
          Ontology
      keyword:
        China's rise
        Chinese schools of IR theory
        international historiography
        narrative
        ontology
        pluralism
        tianxia
        wangquan
        zhongyong
      ab:
        The story of International Relations (IR) has always been recounted with a language endemic to the Anglo-liberal political and international experience. This vernacular depicts all states as self-interested expansionists seeking to either promote or antagonise the liberal international order. To advance the meta-theoretical debate on cultural pluralism in IR, this article explores the projection of liberal ontological paradigms onto the historiography of China's "rise". The narrative frames from "theories of foreign policy" depict China as a rational calculator seeking material maximisation. The narrative frames from "theories of international politics" depict China as a revisionist state to be evaluated, managed and contained according to the standards set by Anglo-liberal orthodoxy. This article explores China's "rise" as a struggle for narrative autonomy: a mission to identify and express itself in its own terms. In IR theory, this struggle manifests itself in the concepts of wangquan, zhongyong and tianxia that articulate China's political and international experience using an indigenous vernacular. By situating these different perspectives in a context of cultural relativity, we provide a conceptual detour around the conventional binary discourse that regulates the present debate: one that seeks to acknowledge ontological difference without descending into historiographical antagonism.
        国际关系的历史总是以盎格鲁-自由主义政治和国际关系特有的语言来叙述。这种表述将所有国家描述为自私自利的扩张主义者, 寻求促进或对抗自由主义的国际秩序。为了促进国际关系中关于文化多元论的元理论争论, 本文探讨了自由本体论范式在中国"崛起"史学中的投射。"对外政策理论"的叙事框架将中国描绘成一个追求物质最大化的理性行为体。"国际政治理论"的叙事框架将中国描绘成一个修正主义国家, 按照盎格鲁自由主义正统所设定的标准对中国进行评价, 管理和包容。本文将中国的"崛起"作为一种叙事自主性的斗争:一种用自己的语言来识别和表达自己的使命。在国际关系理论中, 这种斗争体现在王权, 中庸和天下的概念中, 这些概念用本土语言表达了中国的政治和国际经历。 通过把这些不同的观点放在文化相对性的背景下, 本文提供了一个规定了当前辩论的二元话语之外的概念选项:一个寻求承认本体论的差异而不陷入史学对立的话语。
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Asian Studies Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Asian Studies Review
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N