Using, risking, and consent: Why risking harm to bystanders is morally different from risking harm to research subjects.
Subjects in studies on humans are used as a means of conducting the research and achieving whatever good would justify putting them at risk. Accordingly, consent must normally be obtained before subjects are exposed to any substantial risks to their welfare. Bystanders are also often put at risk, bu...
| Publicado en: | Bioethics Vol. 34; no. 9; pp. 899 - 906 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Nov2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=147131996&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 147131996 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02699702 6PJ jtl: Bioethics issn: 02699702 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov2020 vid: 34 iid: 9 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 147131996 10.1111/bioe.12743 ppf: 899 ppct: 7 formats: tig: atl: Using, risking, and consent: Why risking harm to bystanders is morally different from risking harm to research subjects. aug: au: Walen, Alec affil: Rutgers University School of Law, Camden NJ, 08102‐1519, , USA su: Bioethics Clinical trials Consumer attitudes Informed consent (Medical law) Research ethics Human research subjects Risk assessment Safety Patient selection sug: subj: Bioethics Clinical trials Consumer attitudes Informed consent (Medical law) Research ethics Human research subjects Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology) Risk assessment Safety Patient selection keyword: bystanders human subjects research informed consent Means principle research ethics risk bystanders human subjects research informed consent Means principle research ethics risk ab: Subjects in studies on humans are used as a means of conducting the research and achieving whatever good would justify putting them at risk. Accordingly, consent must normally be obtained before subjects are exposed to any substantial risks to their welfare. Bystanders are also often put at risk, but they are not used as a means. Accordingly—or so I argue—consent is more often unnecessary before bystanders are exposed to similar substantial risks to their welfare. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|