Why IRBs should protect bystanders in human research.

Many types of human research activities present risks and burdens to third parties (e.g., bystanders). Few human protection policies directly address the protection of research bystanders, though some address it in passing. In what follows, I re‐iterate reasons why bystanders are entitled to protect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Bioethics Vol. 34; no. 9; pp. 933 - 937
Autor principal: Kimmelman, Jonathan
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Nov2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=147132008&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 147132008
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02699702
        6PJ
      jtl: Bioethics
      issn: 02699702
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2020
      vid: 34
      iid: 9
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        147132008
        10.1111/bioe.12812
      ppf: 933
      ppct: 4
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Why IRBs should protect bystanders in human research.
      aug:
        au: Kimmelman, Jonathan
        affil: Studies of Translation, Ethics, and Medicine (STREAM), Department of Biomedical Ethics, McGill University, Montreal Quebec, , Canada
      su:
        Bioethics
        Medical research
        Research ethics
        Human research subjects
        Safety
        Institutional review boards
      sug:
        subj:
          Bioethics
          Medical research
          Research ethics
          Human research subjects
          Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
          Safety
          Institutional review boards
      keyword:
        bystanders
        ethics review
        IRB
        research ethics
        risk
        bystanders
        ethics review
        IRB
        research ethics
        risk
      ab: Many types of human research activities present risks and burdens to third parties (e.g., bystanders). Few human protection policies directly address the protection of research bystanders, though some address it in passing. In what follows, I re‐iterate reasons why bystanders are entitled to protections. I also argue that Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are in the best position to signal to researchers and sponsors that bystanders should be protected in research. In some cases, IRB review would consist of evaluating bystander protection strategies directly; in other cases, this might entail merely certifying that another institutions, like a drug regulator, has taken adequate measures to protect the welfare of research bystanders.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N