The Self-Portrait of Censorship in Socialist Romania.
Censorship in socialism was a long-lasting institution. Frightening and invisible, it harboured, in fact, various institutions and underwent different historical phases. It prescribed attitudes and themes by partially or totally suppressing them. What was incriminated at some point could be accepted...
| Publicado en: | Caietele Echinox Vol. 39; pp. 23 - 39 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Echinox Cultural Foundation
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=147164844&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 147164844 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 1582960X 90EZ jtl: Caietele Echinox issn: 1582960X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2020 vid: 39 pid: 52779 pub: Echinox Cultural Foundation artinfo: ui: 147164844 10.24193/cechinox.2020.39.02 ppf: 23 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 949KB tig: atl: The Self-Portrait of Censorship in Socialist Romania. aug: au: Maliţa, Liviu affil: Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. su: Censorship Socialism Freedom of expression Power (Social sciences) Literature sug: subj: Censorship Socialism Freedom of expression Power (Social sciences) Literature keyword: Aesthetic Freedoms Censors Ideology Prohibition Propaganda Romanian Writer Subversion Totalitarian Communist Regime Victim ab: Censorship in socialism was a long-lasting institution. Frightening and invisible, it harboured, in fact, various institutions and underwent different historical phases. It prescribed attitudes and themes by partially or totally suppressing them. What was incriminated at some point could be accepted a few years later. A theme, however, has always been taboo: censorship itself, political power’s discretionary and abusive act of limiting the freedom of expression in literature. Based on archival documents (mainly from the National Archives of Romania), this paper aims to reconstruct the way in which the Censorship removed fragments or whole texts in which it could see (or appeared to see) its own image. The reports of the censors may be seen as self-portraits, including the points of collision and the lines of tension between literature and power. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Caietele Echinox is the property of Echinox Cultural Foundation and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Caietele Echinox holder: Echinox Cultural Foundation dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|