The lexical access of multiple words during a single fixation: overlapping access processes?
Since it has become increasingly difficult to tease apart the predictions of serial and parallel models of eye movement control during reading, we return to the underlying theoretical question of whether parallel lexical processing of two words is, at the very least, psychologically plausible. Two h...
| Publicado en: | Language, Cognition & Neuroscience Vol. 35; no. 10; pp. 1435 - 1445 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dec2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=147224590&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 147224590 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 23273798 IQ6T jtl: Language, Cognition & Neuroscience issn: 23273798 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2020 vid: 35 iid: 10 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 147224590 147224590 147224590 10.1080/23273798.2020.1792952 147224590 ppf: 1435 ppct: 10 formats: tig: atl: The lexical access of multiple words during a single fixation: overlapping access processes? aug: au: Wakeford, Laura J. Murray, Wayne S. affil: Division of Psychology, Abertay University, Dundee, Scotland sug: subj: Reading Eye Movements Language Processing Human Language Tests Recognition (Psychology) ab: Since it has become increasingly difficult to tease apart the predictions of serial and parallel models of eye movement control during reading, we return to the underlying theoretical question of whether parallel lexical processing of two words is, at the very least, psychologically plausible. Two horizontally aligned letter strings were presented simultaneously on a screen, the task being to decide whether they were physically identical or not. Even with presentation durations short enough to prohibit serial inspection of each word, the results show clear lexical effects: high frequency word pairs were responded to faster and with fewer errors than low frequency words. Effects of lexicality, orthography and scanning direction were also found. The results suggest that two words can be processed at a lexical level in an overlapping fashion. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|