Programming Away Human Rights and Responsibilities? "The Moral Machine Experiment" and the Need for a More "Humane" AV Future.
Dilemma situations involving the choice of which human life to save in the case of unavoidable accidents are expected to arise only rarely in the context of autonomous vehicles (AVs). Nonetheless, the scientific community has devoted significant attention to finding appropriate and (socially) accept...
| Publicado en: | NanoEthics Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 285 - 300 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Oct2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=147298193&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 147298193 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 18714757 46ON jtl: NanoEthics issn: 18714757 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2020 vid: 14 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 147298193 10.1007/s11569-020-00374-4 ppf: 285 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 394KB tig: atl: Programming Away Human Rights and Responsibilities? "The Moral Machine Experiment" and the Need for a More "Humane" AV Future. aug: au: Kochupillai, Mrinalini Lütge, Christoph Poszler, Franziska affil: Department of Aerospace and Geodesy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany Munich Intellectual Property Law Center, Munich, Germany Institute for Ethics in Artificial Intelligence, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany Chair of Business Ethics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany su: United Nations. General Assembly. Universal Declaration of Human Rights Ethical problems Human rights Torts Codes of ethics Acquisition of data sug: subj: United Nations. General Assembly. Universal Declaration of Human Rights Ethical problems Human rights Torts Codes of ethics Acquisition of data keyword: Artificial intelligence Autonomous vehicles Ethics Human dignity Human values Law Moral machines Responsibility Tort law ab: Dilemma situations involving the choice of which human life to save in the case of unavoidable accidents are expected to arise only rarely in the context of autonomous vehicles (AVs). Nonetheless, the scientific community has devoted significant attention to finding appropriate and (socially) acceptable automated decisions in the event that AVs or drivers of AVs were indeed to face such situations. Awad and colleagues, in their now famous paper "The Moral Machine Experiment", used a "multilingual online 'serious game' for collecting large-scale data on how citizens would want AVs to solve moral dilemmas in the context of unavoidable accidents." Awad and colleagues undoubtedly collected an impressive and philosophically useful data set of armchair intuitions. However, we argue that applying their findings to the development of "global, socially acceptable principles for machine learning" would violate basic tenets of human rights law and fundamental principles of human dignity. To make its arguments, our paper cites principles of tort law, relevant case law, provisions from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and rules from the German Ethics Code for Autonomous and Connected Driving. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: NanoEthics is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved. item: NanoEthics holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|