NAPLAN discourses: a systematic review after the first decade.
In 2018 NAPLAN (National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy) reached a 10-year milestone. Introduced in 2008 by the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), NAPLAN assesses student literacy and numeracy in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. As a key education reform in Australia,...
| Publicado en: | Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education Vol. 41; no. 6; pp. 871 - 887 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dec2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=147310757&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 147310757 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01596306 54J jtl: Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education issn: 01596306 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2020 vid: 41 iid: 6 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 147310757 10.1080/01596306.2018.1557111 ppf: 871 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.4MB tig: atl: NAPLAN discourses: a systematic review after the first decade. aug: au: Rose, Judy Low-Choy, Samantha Singh, Parlo Vasco, Daniela affil: Office of Research, Faculty of Arts, Education and Law Group, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Griffith Institute for Educational Research, School of Education and Professional Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia su: Professionalism Standardized tests Professional identity Educational change Student engagement Discourse Australia sug: subj: Australia Professionalism Standardized tests Professional identity Educational change Student engagement Discourse keyword: big data data discourses datafication of education Large-scale standardised testing NAPLAN systematic quantitative review ab: In 2018 NAPLAN (National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy) reached a 10-year milestone. Introduced in 2008 by the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), NAPLAN assesses student literacy and numeracy in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. As a key education reform in Australia, NAPLAN has provoked critical debate across public, political and academic fora. This study synthesises themes emerging from a quantitative systematic review of NAPLAN-related literature to identify the main discourses that have emerged in response to this large-scale standardised assessment programme. The dominant discourses coalesce around 'datafication', 'social justice', 'affect and emotion', and 'accountability and performativity'. The stakes are high in these discursive struggles around NAPLAN as large-scale standardised testing is reconstituting the purposes of education, the professionalism and professional identities of educators, and affecting parents and students' engagement in schooling. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|