Histological evaluation of acetabular bone quality during revision hip arthroplasty.
Purpose: Aim of this study was to evaluate acetabular bone vitality during revision hip arthroplasty and to compare the bone quality between revision and primary acetabular arthroplasty. Methods: During primary and revision total hip arthroplasty surgeries, biopsies were taken from the acetabulum af...
| Publicado en: | Hip International Vol. 30; pp. 66 - 72 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
2020 Supplement 2
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=147380474&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 147380474 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 11207000 627B jtl: Hip International issn: 11207000 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2020 Supplement 2 vid: 30 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 147380474 147380474 147380474 10.1177/1120700020966803 147380474 ppf: 66 ppct: 6 formats: tig: atl: Histological evaluation of acetabular bone quality during revision hip arthroplasty. aug: au: Bistolfi, Alessandro Linari, Alessandra Aprato, Alessandro Fusini, Federico Cravero, Ester Papotti, Mauro Ferracini, Riccardo Massè, Alessandro affil: Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation, AOU City of Health and Science, Turin, Italy sug: subj: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip Methods Histological Techniques Acetabulum Bone Density Evaluation Human Biopsy Benzopyrans Microscopy Methods Radiography Evaluation Male Female Middle Age Aged Descriptive Statistics Comparative Studies Middle Aged: 45-64 years Aged: 65+ years Male Female ab: Purpose: Aim of this study was to evaluate acetabular bone vitality during revision hip arthroplasty and to compare the bone quality between revision and primary acetabular arthroplasty. Methods: During primary and revision total hip arthroplasty surgeries, biopsies were taken from the acetabulum after reaming. The samples (osteochondral cylinders of approximately ⩽1 cm long and 3 mm thickness), after removing the mineral component, were cut longitudinally with a thickness section of 5 µm and colored with hematoxylin-eosin dichromic dye and then evaluated histologically by optical microscopy with 40× magnification. Preoperative radiographs were evaluated. Results: According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 patients formed the revision group patients (mean age: 67.9 years, average time before revision 8.8 years, SD ± 7.06) and 5 patients formed the control primary group (mean age: 61.4 years). The bone quality of the revision group was generally poorer than the primary group, while similar vitality and bone quality has been found between septic and aseptic group. Variables such as age, gender and BMI did not significantly contribute to define bone quality classes. Conclusions: The study confirms the differences in quality and bone vitality between cases and controls and the necessity to find strategies to improve the osteointegrative processes in revision arthroplasties. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|