Differences in force-time parameters and electromyographic characteristics of two high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulations following one another in quick succession.

Background: Spinal manipulative therapy is an effective treatment for neck pain. However, the mechanisms underlying its clinical efficacy are not fully understood. Previous studies have not systematically compared force-time parameters and electromyographic responses associated with spinal manipulat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 1 - 13
Autores principales: Gorrell, Lindsay M., Conway, Philip J., Herzog, Walter
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 12/8/2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=147455111&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 147455111
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2045709X
        BG1Z
      jtl: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
      issn: 2045709X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 12/8/2020
      vid: 28
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        147455111
        147455111
        147455111
        10.1186/s12998-020-00355-0
        147455111
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Differences in force-time parameters and electromyographic characteristics of two high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulations following one another in quick succession.
      aug:
        au:
          Gorrell, Lindsay M.
          Conway, Philip J.
          Herzog, Walter
        affil: Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Electromyography
          Biomechanics
          Manual Therapy
          Spine
          Neck Pain Therapy
          Human
          Cervical Vertebrae
          Thoracic Vertebrae
          Pain Management
          Electrodes
          Descriptive Research
          Nonexperimental Studies
      ab: Background: Spinal manipulative therapy is an effective treatment for neck pain. However, the mechanisms underlying its clinical efficacy are not fully understood. Previous studies have not systematically compared force-time parameters and electromyographic responses associated with spinal manipulation. In this study, force-time parameters and electromyographic characteristics associated with multiple manual high-velocity, low-amplitude cervical and upper thoracic spinal manipulations were investigated. The purpose of this analysis was to compare the force-time parameters and electromyographic characteristics between two spinal manipulations delivered following one another in quick succession if the first thrust was not associated with an audible cavitation. Methods: Nine asymptomatic and eighteen symptomatic participants received six Diversified-style spinal manipulations to the cervical and upper thoracic spines during data collected February 2018 to September 2019. Peak force, rate of force application and thrust duration were measured using a pressure pad. Bipolar surface electrodes were used to measure the electromyographic responses and reflex delay times in sixteen neck, back and limb outlet muscles bilaterally. Differences in force-time parameters and electromyographic data were analyzed between the first and second thrust. Results: Fifty-two spinal manipulations were included in this analysis. Peak force was greater (p < 0.001) and rate of force application faster (p < 0.001) in the second thrust. Furthermore, peak electromyographic responses were higher following the second thrust in asymptomatic (p < 0.001) and symptomatic (p < 0.001) subjects. Also, electromyographic delays were shorter in the symptomatic compared to the asymptomatic participants for the second thrust (p = 0.039). There were no adverse patient events. Conclusion: When a second manipulation was delivered because there was not audible cavitation during the first thrust, the second thrust was associated with greater treatment forces and faster thrust rates. Peak electromyographic responses were greater following the second thrust.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N