Investors' Rights in (Crypto) Custodial Holdings: Ruscoe v Cryptopia Ltd (in Liquidation).
Ruscoe v Cryptopia Ltd (in Liquidation) is a landmark decision of the New Zealand High Court that considers for the first time in a comprehensive way whether cryptocurrencies are property at common law and to what extent account holders' (interests in) cryptocurrencies are protected from the claims...
| Publicado en: | Modern Law Review Vol. 84; no. 1; pp. 155 - 168 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jan2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=147531907&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 147531907 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00267961 D8H jtl: Modern Law Review issn: 00267961 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jan2021 vid: 84 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 147531907 10.1111/1468-2230.12588 ppf: 155 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 198KB tig: atl: Investors' Rights in (Crypto) Custodial Holdings: Ruscoe v Cryptopia Ltd (in Liquidation). aug: au: Solinas, Matteo su: Investors Cryptocurrencies Common law Metaphysics Political science sug: subj: Investors Cryptocurrencies Common law Metaphysics Political science ab: Ruscoe v Cryptopia Ltd (in Liquidation) is a landmark decision of the New Zealand High Court that considers for the first time in a comprehensive way whether cryptocurrencies are property at common law and to what extent account holders' (interests in) cryptocurrencies are protected from the claims of the insolvent crypto‐exchange's creditors. The ruling relies on a body of case law from various common law jurisdictions and, to a significant extent, on the findings of the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce Legal Statement on Cryptoassets and Smart Contracts. In tackling complex areas of legal uncertainty, it provides an authoritative conceptual benchmark for future court decisions and normative initiatives. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Modern Law Review holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2021 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|