Hidden Transcripts? The Supposedly Self-Censoring Paul and Rome as Surveillance State in Modern Pauline Scholarship.

This article argues that one of the central theses of the counter-imperial reading of Paul has been more asserted than proved – namely, the thesis that Paul disguised anti-imperial sentiments in his letters specifically because speaking out against imperial authorities was too dangerous. This claim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:New Testament Studies Vol. 67; no. 1; pp. 55 - 73
Main Author: Robinson, Laura
Format: Article
Published: Cambridge University Press Jan2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=147621476&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 147621476
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00286885
        NTS
      jtl: New Testament Studies
      issn: 00286885
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2021
      vid: 67
      iid: 1
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        147621476
        10.1017/S0028688520000235
      ppf: 55
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Hidden Transcripts? The Supposedly Self-Censoring Paul and Rome as Surveillance State in Modern Pauline Scholarship.
      aug:
        au: Robinson, Laura
        affil: Duke University, 407 Chapel Drive, 209A Gray Building, Campus Box 90964, Durham , NC 27708, USA.
      su:
        Mass surveillance
        Private police
        Wright, N. T. (Nicholas Thomas), 1948-
        Provincial governments
        Scholarships
        Soldiers' letters
        Rome
      sug:
        subj:
          Rome
          Mass surveillance
          Private police
          Wright, N. T. (Nicholas Thomas), 1948-
          Provincial governments
          Scholarships
          Soldiers' letters
      keyword:
        anti-imperial criticism
        censorship
        hidden transcripts
        Paul
        Roman Empire
      ab: This article argues that one of the central theses of the counter-imperial reading of Paul has been more asserted than proved – namely, the thesis that Paul disguised anti-imperial sentiments in his letters specifically because speaking out against imperial authorities was too dangerous. This claim is the basic assumption behind the search in Paul's letters for 'hidden' or 'coded' transcripts. Such an approach can be found in the works of Warren Carter, N. T. Wright, and Richard Horsley, among others. But how likely is it that Paul would have felt the need to encode his anti-imperial sentiments? Was there really a risk that Roman soldiers would have intercepted Paul's mail or prosecuted him for its contents? Is the 'hidden transcript' idea an anachronistic concept based on modern surveillance states and transposed into the ancient world? This paper questions how likely it is that Rome's provincial governments would have had the inclination or ability to police private correspondence for seditious sentiments. From there, we can determine whether Paul is speaking as openly as he wants or is in fact protecting himself using 'hidden transcripts'.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N