Through the Fractured Looking Glass.
I argue that diversity and pluralism are valuable not just for science but for philosophy of science. Given the partiality and perspectivism of representation, pluralism preserving integration can increase accuracy. Perspectivism is often supported by appeal to visual representation. I draw further...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 87; no. 5; pp. 771 - 793 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Dec2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=147626979&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 147626979 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2020 vid: 87 iid: 5 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 147626979 10.1086/710787 ppf: 771 ppct: 22 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.7MB tig: atl: Through the Fractured Looking Glass. aug: au: Mitchell, Sandra D. su: Mirrors Philosophy of science Sensorimotor integration Forecasting Pluralism sug: subj: Mirrors Philosophy of science Sensorimotor integration Forecasting Pluralism ab: I argue that diversity and pluralism are valuable not just for science but for philosophy of science. Given the partiality and perspectivism of representation, pluralism preserving integration can increase accuracy. Perspectivism is often supported by appeal to visual representation. I draw further insights from multimodel sensory integration for understanding experiment-based predictions of protein structure. The epistemic lessons learned from the scientific case also apply to philosophy of science itself. Finally, I suggest that a critical, nuanced philosophical view of legitimate sources of pluralism in science has an important role to play in public discourse. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|