Factor Analysis of Spontaneous Speech in Aphasia.

Purpose: Spontaneous speech tasks are critically important for characterizing spoken language production deficits in aphasia and for assessing the impact of therapy. The utility of such tasks arises from the complex interaction of linguistic demands (word retrieval, sentence formulation, articulatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 63; no. 12; pp. 4127 - 4148
Autor principal: Gordon, Jean K.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Dec2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=147627796&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 147627796
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2020
      vid: 63
      iid: 12
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        147627796
        10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00340
      ppf: 4127
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.5MB
      tig:
        atl: Factor Analysis of Spontaneous Speech in Aphasia.
      aug:
        au: Gordon, Jean K.
        affil: Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City
      su:
        Speech
        Oral communication
        Semantics
        Comparative grammar
        Storytelling
        Task performance
        Aphasia
        Grammar
        Comparative studies
        Physiological aspects of speech
        Statistics
        Data analysis
        Phonological awareness
        Rehabilitation of aphasic persons
        Data analysis software
        Descriptive statistics
        Mean length of utterance
        One-way analysis of variance
      sug:
        subj:
          Speech
          Oral communication
          Semantics
          Comparative grammar
          Storytelling
          Task performance
          Aphasia
          Grammar
          Comparative studies
          Physiological aspects of speech
          Statistics
          Data analysis
          Phonological awareness
          Rehabilitation of aphasic persons
          Data analysis software
          Descriptive statistics
          Mean length of utterance
          One-way analysis of variance
      ab: Purpose: Spontaneous speech tasks are critically important for characterizing spoken language production deficits in aphasia and for assessing the impact of therapy. The utility of such tasks arises from the complex interaction of linguistic demands (word retrieval, sentence formulation, articulation). However, this complexity also makes spontaneous speech hugely variable and difficult to assess. The current study aimed to simplify the problem by identifying latent factors underlying performance in spontaneous speech in aphasia. The ecological validity of the factors was examined by examining how well the factor structures corresponded to traditionally defined aphasia subtypes. Method: A factor analysis was conducted on 17 microlinguistic measures of narratives from 274 individuals with aphasia in AphasiaBank. The resulting factor scores were compared across aphasia subtypes. Supervised (linear discriminant analysis) and unsupervised (latent profile analysis) classification techniques were then conducted on the factor scores and the solutions compared to traditional aphasia subtypes. Results: Six factors were identified. Two reflected aspects of fluency, one at the phrase level (Phrase Building) and one at the narrative level (Narrative Productivity). Two other factors reflected the accuracy of productions, one at the word level (Semantic Anomaly) and one at the utterance level (Grammatical Error). The other two factors reflected the complexity of sentence structures (Grammatical Complexity) and the use of repair behaviors (Repair), respectively. Linear discriminant analyses showed that only about two thirds of speakers were classified correctly and that misclassifications were similar to disagreements between clinical diagnoses. The most accurately diagnosed syndromes were the largest groups--Broca's and anomic aphasia. The latent profile analysis also generated profiles similar to Broca's and anomic aphasia but separated some subtypes according to severity. Conclusions: The factor solution and the classification analyses reflected broad patterns of spontaneous speech performance in a large and representative sample of individuals with aphasia. However, such data-driven approaches present a simplified picture of aphasia patterns, much as traditional syndrome categories do. To ensure ecological validity, a hybrid approach is recommended, balancing population-level analyses with examination of performance at the level of theoretically specified subgroups or individuals.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N