A systematic review of reflective practice questionnaires and scales for healthcare professionals: a narrative synthesis.
Reflective Practice (RP) is considered a crucial component of personal and professional learning. RP is regarded as a way that professionals learn from experience to understand and enhance their practice by responding appropriately to self-reflection. Despite playing a crucial role in healthcare set...
| Publicado en: | Reflective Practice Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 1 - 16 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Feb2021
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=147925573&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 147925573 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14623943 BCZ jtl: Reflective Practice issn: 14623943 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2021 vid: 22 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 147925573 145580230 147925573 147925573 10.1080/14623943.2020.1801406 147925573 ppf: 1 ppct: 15 formats: tig: atl: A systematic review of reflective practice questionnaires and scales for healthcare professionals: a narrative synthesis. aug: au: Ooi, Su Min Fisher, Paul Coker, Siân affil: Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Therapies, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK sug: subj: Reflection Evaluation Professional Practice Evaluation Health Personnel Questionnaires Scales Self Report Human Systematic Review PubMed CINAHL Database Psycinfo Checklists Experiential Learning ab: Reflective Practice (RP) is considered a crucial component of personal and professional learning. RP is regarded as a way that professionals learn from experience to understand and enhance their practice by responding appropriately to self-reflection. Despite playing a crucial role in healthcare settings, there is little agreement on how to assess RP. This study aims to systematically review self-rating instruments that assess RP in healthcare professionals. Peer review articles assessing RP in healthcare professionals using a self-rating instrument, published in English between 1998 and 2018 from PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychInfo databases, were considered for inclusion. Eighteen papers were appraised, the strengths and weaknesses of the measures were discussed in accordance with an adapted critical appraisal checklist. In general, all self-report instruments included in this review were potentially generalisable to healthcare professionals or health science programmes with some adaptation. Given the limited evidence for other measurement scales, the Reflective Questionnaire and Self-Reflection and Insight Scale are recommended for measuring RP within healthcare settings. Future research developing a standardised tool for the review of mixed-method, heterogeneous, questionnaire studies is strongly recommended. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|