Does cup position differ between trabecular metal and titanium cups? A radiographic propensity score matched study of 300 hips.

Background and purpose — The use of trabecular metal cups in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing, despite the survival of Continuum cups being slightly inferior compared with other uncemented cups in registries. This difference is mainly explained by a higher rate of dislocation revis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Acta Orthopaedica Vol. 91; no. 6; pp. 682 - 687
Autores principales: Laaksonen, Inari, Hjelmberg, Natalie, Gromov, Kirill, Eskelinen, Antti E, Rolfson, Ola, Malchau, Henrik, Troelsen, Anders, Mäkelä, Keijo T, Mohaddes, Maziar
Formato: diagnostic images research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Medical Journals Sweden AB Dec2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=148075920&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 148075920
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17453674
        1BVL
      jtl: Acta Orthopaedica
      issn: 17453674
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2020
      vid: 91
      iid: 6
      pid: 59195
      pub: Medical Journals Sweden AB
    artinfo:
      ui:
        148075920
        145552405
        148075920
        148075920
        10.1080/17453674.2020.1788290
        148075920
      ppf: 682
      ppct: 5
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Does cup position differ between trabecular metal and titanium cups? A radiographic propensity score matched study of 300 hips.
      aug:
        au:
          Laaksonen, Inari
          Hjelmberg, Natalie
          Gromov, Kirill
          Eskelinen, Antti E
          Rolfson, Ola
          Malchau, Henrik
          Troelsen, Anders
          Mäkelä, Keijo T
          Mohaddes, Maziar
        affil: Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland, Finnish Arthroplasty Register, Helsinki, Finland
      sug:
        subj:
          Hip Dislocation Pathology
          Hip Dislocation Surgery
          Hip Anatomy and Histology
          Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip Methods
          Outcomes (Health Care)
          Postoperative Complications Risk Factors
          Risk Assessment
          Human
          Probability
          Comparative Studies
          Hip Pathology
          Osteoarthritis
          Hip Radiography
          Software
          Confidence Intervals
          Descriptive Statistics
          Matched-Pair Analysis
      ab: Background and purpose — The use of trabecular metal cups in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing, despite the survival of Continuum cups being slightly inferior compared with other uncemented cups in registries. This difference is mainly explained by a higher rate of dislocation revisions. Cup malpositioning is a risk factor for dislocation and, being made of a highly porous material, Continuum cups might be more difficult to position. We evaluated whether Continuum cups had worse cup positioning compared with other uncemented cups. Patients and methods — Based on power calculation, 150 Continuum cups from 1 center were propensity score matched with 150 other uncemented cups from 4 centers. All patients had an uncemented stem, femoral head size of 32 mm or 36 mm, and BMI between 19 and 35. All operations were done for primary osteoarthrosis through a posterior approach. Patients were matched using age, sex, and BMI. Cup positioning was measured from anteroposterior pelvic radiograph using the Martell Hip Analysis Suite software. Results — There was no clinically relevant difference in mean inclination angle between the study group and the control group (43° [95% CI 41–44] and 43° [CI 42–45], respectively). The study group had a larger mean anteversion angle compared with the control group, 19° (CI 18–20) and 17° (CI 15–18) respectively. Interpretation — Continuum cups had a greater anteversion compared with the other uncemented cups. However, the median anteversion was acceptable in both groups and this difference does not explain the larger dislocation rate in the Continuum cups observed in earlier studies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N