Dialogue as the Conditio Humana: a Critical Account of Dmitri Nikulin's Theory of the Dialogical.
Dmitri Nikulin is one of the few contemporary philosophers to have devoted books to the topic of dialogue and the dialogical self, especially in the last fifteen years. Yet his work on dialogue and the dialogical has received scant attention by philosophers, and this neglect has hurt the ongoing dev...
| Publicado en: | Sophia Vol. 59; no. 4; pp. 779 - 793 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=148113296&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 148113296 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00381527 3OR0 jtl: Sophia issn: 00381527 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2020 vid: 59 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 148113296 10.1007/s11841-019-00746-8 ppf: 779 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 314KB tig: atl: Dialogue as the Conditio Humana: a Critical Account of Dmitri Nikulin's Theory of the Dialogical. aug: au: Warfield, Bradley S. affil: The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, One West University Blvd., BMSLC 3.224, 78520, Brownsville, TX, USA su: Philosophers Self Scholarships sug: subj: Philosophers Self Scholarships keyword: Agency Dialogicality Dialogue Dmitri Nikulin The dialogical self ab: Dmitri Nikulin is one of the few contemporary philosophers to have devoted books to the topic of dialogue and the dialogical self, especially in the last fifteen years. Yet his work on dialogue and the dialogical has received scant attention by philosophers, and this neglect has hurt the ongoing development of contemporary philosophical work on dialogicality. I want to address this lacuna in contemporary philosophical scholarship on dialogicality and suggest that, although Nikulin's account is no doubt insightful and thought-provoking, it is problematic for two main reasons: first, his account fails to recognize the proper relationship between dialogue and agency; and second, his enumeration of the necessary and sufficient conditions for dialogue contains conceptual inconsistencies. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Sophia is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved. item: Sophia holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|