Comparison of maximal isometric forearm supination torque in two elbow positions between subjects with and without limited forearm supination range of motion.

Study Design: Cross-sectional comparison. Introduction: Forearm supination range of motion is often limited by short or stiff pronators. Many studies have examined maximal isometric forearm supination torque (MIFST). However, there is little research comparing MIFST in two elbow positions between su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Physiotherapy Theory & Practice Vol. 37; no. 1; pp. 99 - 106
Autores principales: Gwak, Gyeong-Tae, Hwang, Ui-Jae, Jung, Sung-Hoon, Kim, Jun-Hee, Kim, Moon-Hwan, Kwon, Oh-Yun
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jan2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=148164575&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 148164575
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09593985
        BCJ
      jtl: Physiotherapy Theory & Practice
      issn: 09593985
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2021
      vid: 37
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        148164575
        148164575
        148164575
        10.1080/09593985.2019.1616342
        148164575
      ppf: 99
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparison of maximal isometric forearm supination torque in two elbow positions between subjects with and without limited forearm supination range of motion.
      aug:
        au:
          Gwak, Gyeong-Tae
          Hwang, Ui-Jae
          Jung, Sung-Hoon
          Kim, Jun-Hee
          Kim, Moon-Hwan
          Kwon, Oh-Yun
        affil: Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju, Gangwon-do, Korea
      sug:
        subj:
          Forearm
          Range of Motion
          Torque
          Elbow Physiology
          Body Positions
          Supination
          Human
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Flexion
          Male
          Female
          Dominance, Cerebral
          Motion Analysis Systems
          Repeated Measures
          Two-Way Analysis of Variance
          Unpaired T-Tests
          Splints
          Extension
          Matched Case Control
          Wearable Sensors
          Confidence Intervals
          Data Analysis Software
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Intrarater Reliability
          Male
          Female
      ab: Study Design: Cross-sectional comparison. Introduction: Forearm supination range of motion is often limited by short or stiff pronators. Many studies have examined maximal isometric forearm supination torque (MIFST). However, there is little research comparing MIFST in two elbow positions between subjects with and without limited forearm supination range of motion (LSR). Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study was to compare MIFST in two elbow positions (90º flexed elbow, extended elbow) between subjects with and without LSR. Methods: Thirteen right-handed subjects (seven men, six women) with LSR and 13 age- and gender-matched healthy controls participated in this study. The forearm supination range of motion and MIFST were measured using a Smart KEMA system. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare MIFST in two elbow positions between subjects with and without LSR. Results: No significant difference between groups (p >.05) was found. However, there was an interaction effect between elbow position and group on MIFST (p <.05). Independent t-tests were used to confirm the simple effects. In the LSR group, the value of MIFST was significantly lower in the elbow-extended position than in the group without LSR (p <.05). Conclusions: These findings indicate that elbow position should be considered when assessing the strength or increasing the strength of the supinator muscle, especially in patients with LSR.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Unknown
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N