Comparison between success rates for smokers re‐treated by a smokers' clinic and success rates for smokers treated for the first time.

Aims: To compare success rates and characteristics of smokers treated a second time by a smokers' clinic with success rates of their first treatment. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tobacco Dependence Treatment clinic in Prague, Czech Republic, between 2005 and 2017. Participants: A tota...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Addiction Vol. 116; no. 2; pp. 346 - 356
Autores principales: Stepankova, Lenka, Kralikova, Eva, Zvolska, Kamila, Pankova, Alexandra, Adamcekova, Zuzana, Kuhn, Matyas, Noland, Derek
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=148184419&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 148184419
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09652140
        AIO
      jtl: Addiction
      issn: 09652140
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2021
      vid: 116
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        148184419
        145858842
        148184419
        148184419
        10.1111/add.15175
        148184419
      ppf: 346
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparison between success rates for smokers re‐treated by a smokers' clinic and success rates for smokers treated for the first time.
      aug:
        au:
          Stepankova, Lenka
          Kralikova, Eva
          Zvolska, Kamila
          Pankova, Alexandra
          Adamcekova, Zuzana
          Kuhn, Matyas
          Noland, Derek
        affil: Centre for Tobacco Dependence, 3rd Medical Department, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague,, Czech Republic
      sug:
        subj:
          Smoking Therapy
          Smoking Cessation Programs
          Outcome Assessment
          Human
          Czech Republic
          Retrospective Design
          Prospective Studies
          Confidence Intervals
          Descriptive Statistics
      ab: Aims: To compare success rates and characteristics of smokers treated a second time by a smokers' clinic with success rates of their first treatment. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tobacco Dependence Treatment clinic in Prague, Czech Republic, between 2005 and 2017. Participants: A total of 5225 smokers treated either once (n = 5006, single treatment sample, SS) or also second time (n = 219, re‐treated sample, RS), on average 4.47 years after the first visit. Intervention: Smokers received intensive treatment of tobacco dependence with pharmacotherapy options. Outcomes were evaluated after 1 year. In case of failure or relapse, participants could undergo re‐treatment in the same setting at least 1 year after the start of the first treatment. Measurements Twelve‐month self‐reported continuous abstinence; CO‐validated (≤ 6 parts per million); number of visits; type of pharmacotherapy; mental health history; Fagerström Test for Cigarette Dependence; time between first and second treatment. Results: The abstinence rate in the SS was 34.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 33.4%, 36.1%] and in the RS was 37% (95% CI = 30.6%, 43.8%) and 39.7% (95% CI = 33.2%, 45.5%) for their first and second treatments, respectively. The samples were comparable on smoking and socio‐demographic characteristics and pharmacotherapy used, but the RS in the second treatment had a higher prevalence of diagnosed mental health disorder at 39.3% (95% CI = 32.8%; 46.1%) compared with 23.7% (95% CI = 22.5%; 24.9%) in the SS. Participants who initiated their second quit attempt 1 to 2 years after the first one were less successful than those who initiated their second quit attempt later (25 versus 43%; P < 0.05). The results of the first treatment cycle were not found to be a reliable predictor for outcomes of the second cycle of treatment in univariate or multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.70–2.63, P = 0.373). Conclusion: In Prague, Czech Republic, smokers re‐attending stop‐smoking treatment more than 2 years after their previous quit attempt appear to achieve similar success rates to those being treated for the first time.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N