Non-Piecemeal Pluralism.
I argue that Schaffer fails to provide a non-question-begging argument for priority monism. Despite his suggestion to the contrary, Humean pluralists need not, and plausibly do not, endorse his tiling constraint on metaphysically basic objects. Moreover, the distinction between supervenience—of the...
| Publicado en: | Monist Vol. 104; no. 1; pp. 91 - 108 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Jan2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |