Virtualization as a Mode of Organizing: Ontology, Becoming, Modulation.

In organizational theories inspired by process ontologies of Spinoza, Bergson, or Deleuze, an organization only seems to be the effect of ontological forces and therefore exist only retroactively and derivatively. Simply put, process ontologies tend to overemphasize the virtual, active ontological f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 70 - 88
Autor principal: Peters, Christian Helge
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: TAMARA: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=148350013&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 148350013
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15325555
        G90A
      jtl: Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry
      issn: 15325555
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2020
      vid: 18
      iid: 1
      pid: 15796
      pub: TAMARA: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science
    artinfo:
      ui:
        148350013
        10.7206/tamara.1532-5555.9
      ppf: 70
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Virtualization as a Mode of Organizing: Ontology, Becoming, Modulation.
      aug:
        au: Peters, Christian Helge
        affil: Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
      su:
        Deleuze, Gilles, 1925-1995
        Ontology
      sug:
        subj:
          Ontology
          Deleuze, Gilles, 1925-1995
      keyword:
        Gilles Deleuze
        Process ontology
        virtualization
        Gilles Deleuze
        Process ontology
        virtualization
      ab: In organizational theories inspired by process ontologies of Spinoza, Bergson, or Deleuze, an organization only seems to be the effect of ontological forces and therefore exist only retroactively and derivatively. Simply put, process ontologies tend to overemphasize the virtual, active ontological forces of becoming in organizations. These assumptions cause the negative and reactive understanding of organizational processes: organizations oppress, restrict, adjust, and regulate becoming. In this perspective, organizations are defective, inadequate, and politically reactionary. They are the negative antitype of the positive, productive, and creative ontological forces. In this article, I situate the problem of organizations and becoming using the concept of "virtualization." For Deleuze, actualization is the expression of the virtual, resulting in the actual state of affairs, but once the state of affairs is actualized, there is a modulation or reciprocal folding, which affects the virtual; I suggest calling this "virtualization." Thus, each actualization in the social dimension - each founding of an organization - modulates the ontological conditions of future organizational events. This means that Deleuze provides not only a theory of organizational becoming but also a theory of virtualization - or the modulation of becoming - of organizations. The concept of virtualization is illustrated by drawing on organizational case studies, which have implications for the understanding of virtualization. Virtualization is a process of patterning, a (de)potentialization, but also a de- and reterritorialization. Primarily understood as virtualization, organization is a meta-stable process.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N