Credible Empowerment and Deliberative Participation: A Comparative Study of Two Nuclear Energy Policy Deliberation Cases in Korea.
What factors make deliberative participation of public policy effective? Why, in some cases, are participants in deliberation more motivated than others, and reach their final judgment in a timely manner, based on systematic processes of opinion gathering and consensus building? By comparing and inv...
| Publicado en: | Review of Policy Research Vol. 38; no. 1; pp. 97 - 113 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jan2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=148430356&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 148430356 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 1541132X MJJ jtl: Review of Policy Research issn: 1541132X maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jan2021 vid: 38 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 148430356 10.1111/ropr.12407 ppf: 97 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 257KB tig: atl: Credible Empowerment and Deliberative Participation: A Comparative Study of Two Nuclear Energy Policy Deliberation Cases in Korea. aug: au: Shin, Sangbum Lee, Taedong affil: Yonsei University su: Nuclear energy Energy policy Citizen participation in political planning Radioactive wastes Radioactive waste disposal sug: subj: Nuclear energy Energy policy Citizen participation in political planning Regulation and Administration of Communications, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities Nuclear Electric Power Generation Waste treatment and disposal Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal Radioactive wastes Radioactive waste disposal keyword: credible empowerment decision‐making process deliberative participation nuclear energy waste nuclear power plant Empoderamiento creíble Participación deliberativa Planta de energía nuclear Proceso de toma de decisiones Residuos de energía nuclear 决策过程 协商式参与 可信赋权（Credible Empowerment） 核电站 核能废物 credible empowerment decision‐making process deliberative participation nuclear energy waste nuclear power plant Empoderamiento creíble Participación deliberativa Planta de energía nuclear Proceso de toma de decisiones Residuos de energía nuclear 决策过程 协商式参与 可信赋权（Credible Empowerment） 核电站 核能废物 ab: What factors make deliberative participation of public policy effective? Why, in some cases, are participants in deliberation more motivated than others, and reach their final judgment in a timely manner, based on systematic processes of opinion gathering and consensus building? By comparing and investigating two recent cases of public participation in energy policy deliberation in Korea, we argue that deliberative participation is more effective when the prospect that the outcome of their activities might be accepted by decision makers is high. The two cases, the public deliberation committee (PDC) on the nuclear waste issue which operated from 2013 to 2015, and the PDC on the nuclear power plant construction issue which operated in 2017, show that they went through similar courses of action, and used similar methods for deliberation. However, while the 2017 PDC has produced clear‐cut policy recommendations, and the government have accepted these, the 2013 PDC failed to reach conclusions on the given critical issues. We argue that the difference in the results is caused by credible empowerment along with two other factors––the sensitivity of issues and the learning effect. Participants of deliberation tend to judge the possibility of the government's acceptance of their opinions based on either the government's direct announcement or its inclusiveness in the past policy history. If governments are willing to consult the public to increase legitimacy and transparency, they should send explicit signals to the public on its inclusiveness in the short term, and also should increase credibility in the long term. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|