Estimating malaria chemoprevention and vector control coverage using program and campaign data: A scoping review of current practices and opportunities.

Background: Accurate estimation of intervention coverage is a vital component of malaria program monitoring and evaluation, both for process evaluation (how well program targets are achieved), and impact evaluation (whether intervention coverage had an impact on malaria burden). There is growing int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Global Health Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 1 - 35
Autores principales: Nice, Johanna, Nahusenay, Honelgn, Eckert, Erin, Eisele, Thomas P., Ashton, Ruth A.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Edinburgh University Global Health Society Dec2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=148508328&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 148508328
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        20472978
        DBQG
      jtl: Journal of Global Health
      issn: 20472978
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2020
      vid: 10
      iid: 2
      pid: 72708
      pub: Edinburgh University Global Health Society
    artinfo:
      ui:
        148508328
        148508328
        NLM33110575
        148508328
        10.7189/jogh.10.020413
        NLM33110575
        148508328
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 34
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Estimating malaria chemoprevention and vector control coverage using program and campaign data: A scoping review of current practices and opportunities.
      aug:
        au:
          Nice, Johanna
          Nahusenay, Honelgn
          Eckert, Erin
          Eisele, Thomas P.
          Ashton, Ruth A.
        affil: MEASURE Evaluation, Centre for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Protective Devices
          Insecticides Therapeutic Use
          Malaria Prevention and Control
          Pest Control Methods
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Pregnancy
          Female
          Human
          Chemoprevention
          Impact of Events Scale
          Female
      ab: Background: Accurate estimation of intervention coverage is a vital component of malaria program monitoring and evaluation, both for process evaluation (how well program targets are achieved), and impact evaluation (whether intervention coverage had an impact on malaria burden). There is growing interest in maximizing the utility of program data to generate interim estimates of intervention coverage in the periods between large-scale cross-sectional surveys (the gold standard). As such, this study aimed to identify relevant concepts and themes that may guide future optimization of intervention coverage estimation using routinely collected data, or data collected during and following intervention campaigns, with a particular focus on strategies to define the denominator.Methods: We conducted a scoping review of current practices to estimate malaria intervention coverage for insecticide-treated nets (ITNs); indoor residual spray (IRS); intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp); mass drug administration (MDA); and seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) interventions; case management was excluded. Multiple databases were searched for relevant articles published from January 1, 2015 to June 1, 2018. Additionally, we identified and included other guidance relevant to estimating population denominators, with a focus on innovative techniques.Results: While program data have the potential to provide intervention coverage data, there are still substantial challenges in selecting appropriate denominators. The review identified a lack of consistency in how coverage was defined and reported for each intervention type, with denominator estimation methods not clearly or consistently reported, and denominator estimates rarely triangulated with other data sources to present the feasible range of denominator values and consequently the range of likely coverage estimates.Conclusions: Though household survey-based estimates of intervention coverage remain the gold standard, efforts should be made to further standardize practices for generating interim measurements of intervention coverage from program data, and for estimating and reporting population denominators. This includes fully describing any projections or adjustments made to existing census or population data, exploring opportunities to validate available data by comparing with other sources, and explaining how the denominator has been restricted (or not) to reflect exclusion criteria.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N