How well are DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD represented in standardized diagnostic instruments?
Five years after the publication of DSM-5 in 2013, three widely used diagnostic instruments have published algorithms designed to represent its (sub-)criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in children and adolescents. This study aimed to: (1) establish the content validity of these three DSM-5-...
| Publicado en: | European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 75 - 88 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
2021
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=148519763&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 148519763 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10188827 EJ3 jtl: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry issn: 10188827 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2021 vid: 30 iid: 1 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 148519763 144162692 148519763 148519763 10.1007/s00787-020-01481-z 148519763 ppf: 75 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: How well are DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD represented in standardized diagnostic instruments? aug: au: Evers, Kris Maljaars, Jarymke Carrington, Sarah J. Carter, Alice S. Happé, Francesca Steyaert, Jean Leekam, Susan R. Noens, Ilse affil: Parenting and Special Education Research Unit, KU Leuven, P.O. Box 3765, Leopold Vanderkelenstraat 32, 3000, Leuven, Belgium sug: subj: Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis DSM Classification Instrument Validation Content Validity Algorithms Instrument Adaptation Behavior Human Clinical Assessment Tools Interviews Communicative Disorders Decision Making Validation Studies Child Adolescence Instrument Construction Child: 6-12 years Adolescent: 13-18 years ab: Five years after the publication of DSM-5 in 2013, three widely used diagnostic instruments have published algorithms designed to represent its (sub-)criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in children and adolescents. This study aimed to: (1) establish the content validity of these three DSM-5-adapted algorithms, and (2) identify problems with the operationalization of DSM-5 diagnostic criteria in measurable and observable behaviors. Algorithm items of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Second Edition (ADOS-2), Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview (3di) and Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders—11th edition (DISCO-11) were mapped onto DSM-5 sub-criteria. The development and decision-making rules integrated in their algorithms were then compared with DSM-5. Results demonstrated significant variability in the number and nature of sub-criteria covered by the ADOS-2, 3di and DISCO-11. In addition to differences in the development of algorithms and cut-off scores, instruments also differed in the extent to which they follow DSM-5 decision-making rules for diagnostic classification. We conclude that such differences in interpretation of DSM-5 criteria provide a challenge for symptom operationalization which will be most effectively overcome by consensus, testing and reformulation. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|