An assessment of implementation science research capacity in Uganda.

Background: In Uganda and other resource-poor countries, relevant research findings face a tortuous path to translation into policy and routine practice. Implementation science (ImSc) research could facilitate faster translation. Presently it is unclear what ImSc research capacity and possible train...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Research Policy & Systems Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
Autores principales: Semeere, Aggrey S., Semitala, Fred C., Lunkuse, Olivia, Katahoire, Anne, Sewankambo, Nelson K., Kamya, Moses R.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 2/8/2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=148564924&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 148564924
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14784505
        1CPP
      jtl: Health Research Policy & Systems
      issn: 14784505
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2/8/2021
      vid: 19
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        148564924
        148564924
        NLM33557828
        148564924
        10.1186/s12961-020-00653-2
        NLM33557828
        148564924
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: An assessment of implementation science research capacity in Uganda.
      aug:
        au:
          Semeere, Aggrey S.
          Semitala, Fred C.
          Lunkuse, Olivia
          Katahoire, Anne
          Sewankambo, Nelson K.
          Kamya, Moses R.
        affil: Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda
      sug:
        subj:
          Students
          Infant, Newborn
          Uganda
          Male
          Faculty
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire
          Scales
          Funding Source
          Infant, Newborn: birth-1 month
          Male
      ab: Background: In Uganda and other resource-poor countries, relevant research findings face a tortuous path to translation into policy and routine practice. Implementation science (ImSc) research could facilitate faster translation. Presently it is unclear what ImSc research capacity and possible training needs exist among Ugandan researchers. To assess both components, we interviewed potential trainees in Kampala, Uganda.Methods: We used a cross-sectional design to survey potential ImSc trainees who had some research training and involvement in generating or utilizing research. Using a questionnaire, we documented eligibility for ImSc training, knowledge and interest in training, existing self-assessed confidence in initiating clinical research (SCICR) and self-assessed confidence in initiating ImSc research (SCIIR), availability for training and preferred modes of training. We developed scores from the Likert scales and used descriptive statistics, logistic regression and ordinal logistic regression to evaluate predictors of SCIIR.Results: Between November 2016 and April 2017, we interviewed 190 participants; 60% were men, with a median age of 37 years. Among participants, 33% comprised faculty, 37% were graduate students and 30% were project staff. The majority of respondents knew about ImSc (73%) and were research-trained (80%). Only 9% reported any ImSc-related training. Previous ImSc training was associated with higher odds of a SCIIR score ≥ 75th percentile. Previous ImSc training compared to not having any training was associated with higher odds of reporting abilities in behaviour change theory integration (OR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.3-8.5, p = 0.01) and framework use in intervention design and implementation (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1-7.4, p = 0.03), accounting for age, sex and current employment. In addition, 53% of participants preferred in-person (face-to-face) short ImSc courses compared to a year-long training, while 33% preferred online courses. Participants reported median availability of 6 hours per week (IQR: 4, 10) for training.Conclusion: Most participants had some understanding of ImSc research, had research training and were interested in ImSc training. Those with previous ImSc training had better skills and SCIIR, compared to those without previous training. A hybrid approach with modular face-to-face training and online sessions would suit the preferences of most potential trainees.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N