Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control.
Purpose: Previous studies estimate translation of research evidence into practice takes 17 years. However, this estimate is not specific to cancer control evidence-based practices (EBPs), nor do these studies evaluate variation in the translational process. We examined the translational pathway of c...
| Publicado en: | Cancer Causes & Control Vol. 32; no. 3; pp. 221 - 231 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
2021
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=148566486&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 148566486 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09575243 ODX jtl: Cancer Causes & Control issn: 09575243 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2021 vid: 32 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 148566486 147894680 148566486 NLM33392908 10.1007/s10552-020-01376-z NLM33392908 148566486 ppf: 221 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control. aug: au: Khan, Shahnaz Chambers, David Neta, Gila affil: School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, 20006, Washington, DC, USA sug: subj: Neoplasms Prevention and Control Professional Practice, Evidence-Based Statistics and Numerical Data Preventive Health Care Scales ab: Purpose: Previous studies estimate translation of research evidence into practice takes 17 years. However, this estimate is not specific to cancer control evidence-based practices (EBPs), nor do these studies evaluate variation in the translational process. We examined the translational pathway of cancer control EBPs.Methods: We selected five cancer control EBPs where data on uptake were readily available. Years from landmark publication to clinical guideline issuance to implementation, defined as 50% uptake, were measured. The translational pathway for each EBP was mapped and an average total time across EBPs was calculated.Results: Five cancer control EBPs were included: mammography, clinicians' advice to quit smoking, colorectal cancer screening, HPV co-testing, and HPV vaccination. Time from publication to implementation ranged from 13 to 21 years, averaging 15 years. Time from publication to guideline issuance ranged from 3 to 17 years, and from guideline issuance to implementation, - 4 to 12 years. Clinician's advice to quit smoking, HPV co-testing, and HPV vaccination were most rapidly implemented; colorectal cancer screening and mammography were slowest to implement.Conclusion: The average time to implementation was 15 years for the five EBPs we evaluated, a marginal improvement from prior findings. Although newer EBPs such as HPV vaccination and HPV co-testing were faster to implement than other EBPs, continued efforts in implementation science to speed research to practice are needed. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|