Maitland's Challenge for Administrative Legal Theory.

This paper challenges the familiar strategy for theorising about administrative law. Theories of administrative law typically take the existence of administrative bodies for granted, and then ask, all things considered, what moral aim they should serve. The resulting approaches are committed to vary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Modern Law Review Vol. 84; no. 2; pp. 207 - 230
Autor principal: Weinrib, Jacob
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=148631599&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 148631599
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267961
        D8H
      jtl: Modern Law Review
      issn: 00267961
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2021
      vid: 84
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        148631599
        10.1111/1468-2230.12573
      ppf: 207
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 246KB
      tig:
        atl: Maitland's Challenge for Administrative Legal Theory.
      aug:
        au: Weinrib, Jacob
      su:
        Administrative law
        Maitland, F. W.
        Rule of law
        Public law
        Ideology
      sug:
        subj:
          Administrative law
          Maitland, F. W.
          Rule of law
          Public law
          Ideology
      ab: This paper challenges the familiar strategy for theorising about administrative law. Theories of administrative law typically take the existence of administrative bodies for granted, and then ask, all things considered, what moral aim they should serve. The resulting approaches are committed to varying moral aims ranging from the rule of law to efficiency, but converge on the shared idea that the purpose of administrative law is to promote aims that could, in principle, be realised apart from it. As a critical matter, this paper argues that the familiar strategy opens the door to a devastating sceptical challenge. Because the benefits that administrative law brings can be realised without it, administrative law may be rightly abandoned. As a constructive matter, this paper defends the idea that administrative law has a moral purpose that is inseparable from it: administrative law constitutes the exclusive means of realising what positive rights demand.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Law Review
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N