A systematic review of early adoption of implementation science for HIV prevention or treatment in the United States.
Objective: To provide the first systematic review of the early adoption of implementation science for HIV prevention or treatment in the United States. We identified primary research studies that addressed implementation of HIV prevention or treatment in the United States and qualitatively assessed...
| Published in: | AIDS (02699370) Vol. 35; no. 2; pp. 177 - 192 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Feb2021
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=148635941&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 148635941 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02699370 6FD jtl: AIDS (02699370) issn: 02699370 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2021 vid: 35 iid: 2 pid: 433 pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins place: Baltimore, Maryland artinfo: ui: 148635941 148635941 NLM33048881 148635941 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002713 NLM33048881 148635941 ppf: 177 ppct: 15 formats: tig: atl: A systematic review of early adoption of implementation science for HIV prevention or treatment in the United States. aug: au: Shangani, Sylvia Bhaskar, Nidhi Richmond, Natasha Operario, Don van den Berg, Jacob J. affil: College of Health Sciences, Department of Community & Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia. sug: subj: HIV Infections Prevention and Control United States Human Systematic Review ab: Objective: To provide the first systematic review of the early adoption of implementation science for HIV prevention or treatment in the United States. We identified primary research studies that addressed implementation of HIV prevention or treatment in the United States and qualitatively assessed the reporting of implementation outcomes and intervention descriptions.Methods: We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases for evaluations of HIV prevention or treatment interventions that at least reported one implementation outcome and were published between 2014 and 2018. We used the 12-item Template for Intervention Description and Replication to assess study interventions.Results: A total of 2275 articles were identified. Thirty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. Of these, 84.6% used quantitative methods with 5% being hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies and 15% used qualitative methods. No studies cited a formal theoretical framework for implementation science. Acceptability and feasibility were the most frequently reported implementation outcomes. Eligible studies were diverse with regard to demographic categories. Most interventions focused on HIV prevention, particularly risk-reduction strategies. HIV treatment interventions targeted linkage to care and adherence to medications. Key implementation outcome findings indicated that these interventions are feasible and acceptable in the real world.Conclusion: HIV implementation science could support dissemination of HIV prevention or treatment in the United States, although HIV treatment interventions are limited. Theoretical frameworks and key implementation outcomes like fidelity, penetration, and appropriateness could promote the rigor of future HIV treatment implementation research, helping the field deliver the promise of HIV prevention or treatment efforts in the United States. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|