Big friendly giant.
Examines the claim of economist Richard Schmalensee that Microsoft Corp. does not have a monopoly in the personal computer operating-system market. Schmalensee assisting Microsoft in its defense against antitrust charges brought by the United States government; View that Microsoft does not have the...
| Publicado en: | Economist Vol. 350; no. 8104; pp. 72 - 73 |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Economist Newspaper Limited
1/30/1999
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=1490281&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 1490281 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00130613 ECO jtl: Economist issn: 00130613 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 1/30/1999 vid: 350 iid: 8104 pid: 161 pub: Economist Newspaper Limited artinfo: ui: 1490281 ppf: 72 ppct: 1 formats: tig: atl: Big friendly giant. aug: su: Microsoft Corp. Monopolies Schmalensee, Richard Actions & defenses (Law) United States sug: subj: United States Microsoft Corp. Monopolies Schmalensee, Richard Actions & defenses (Law) ab: Examines the claim of economist Richard Schmalensee that Microsoft Corp. does not have a monopoly in the personal computer operating-system market. Schmalensee assisting Microsoft in its defense against antitrust charges brought by the United States government; View that Microsoft does not have the power of a monopoly to set prices. pubtype: Periodical doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 1999 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|