Cirkulace, import a export osvícenství.

This article is a response to Daniela Tinková’s study Enlightenment as ‘vernacularization of knowledge’. In the first part we comment on the positive aspects of Tinková’s conception of the history of the Enlightenment, but also on the lack of clarity concerning the nature of knowledge as both a comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Cornova Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 27 - 34
Autor principal: Smyčka, Václav
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Institute of Czech Literature of the Czech Academy of Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=149228813&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 149228813
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        18046983
        IQ3K
      jtl: Cornova
      issn: 18046983
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2020
      vid: 10
      iid: 2
      pid: 40085
      pub: Institute of Czech Literature of the Czech Academy of Sciences
    artinfo:
      ui:
        149228813
        10.51305/cor.2020.02.03
      ppf: 27
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Cirkulace, import a export osvícenství.
      aug:
        au: Smyčka, Václav
        affil: Ústav pro českou literaturu AV ČR.
      su:
        Power (Social sciences)
        Intellectual life
        Computer performance
        Monarchy
        Hegemony
      sug:
        subj:
          Power (Social sciences)
          Intellectual life
          Computer performance
          Monarchy
          Hegemony
      keyword:
        18th century
        cultural transfer
        Czech Lands
        Galicia
        české země
        18th century
        18. století
        cultural transfer
        Czech Lands
        Galicia
        Halič
        kulturní transfer
        osvícenství
      ab: This article is a response to Daniela Tinková’s study Enlightenment as ‘vernacularization of knowledge’. In the first part we comment on the positive aspects of Tinková’s conception of the history of the Enlightenment, but also on the lack of clarity concerning the nature of knowledge as both a component of cultural transfer and the outcome of that process. The second part changes perspective, focussing on ‘the transfer of Enlightenment’ and the ‘radiation’ of Enlightenment from the Czech Lands to surrounding regions of the Habsburg monarchy, especially Galicia. For this reason the Czech Lands assumed a regional hegemony in many areas of administration and economic and intellectual life. We also attempt to explain the motivations for accepting ‘Enlightenment knowledge’ while relativizing the power asymmetries in these processes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Czech
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N