"Do identity and distinctness facts threaten the PSR?".

One conception of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) maintains that every fact is metaphysically explained. There are different ways to challenge this version of the PSR; one type of challenge involves pinpointing a specific set of facts that resist metaphysical explanation. Certain identity a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophical Studies Vol. 178; no. 4; pp. 1023 - 1042
Main Author: Shumener, Erica
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Apr2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=149286886&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 149286886
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2021
      vid: 178
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        149286886
        10.1007/s11098-020-01481-4
      ppf: 1023
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 256KB
      tig:
        atl: "Do identity and distinctness facts threaten the PSR?".
      aug:
        au: Shumener, Erica
        affil:
          University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
          Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
      su:
        Metaphysics
        Sufficient reason
        Causation (Philosophy)
        Theory of knowledge
        Logic
      sug:
        subj:
          Metaphysics
          Sufficient reason
          Causation (Philosophy)
          Theory of knowledge
          Logic
      keyword:
        Ground
        Identity
        Principle of Sufficient Reason
      ab: One conception of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) maintains that every fact is metaphysically explained. There are different ways to challenge this version of the PSR; one type of challenge involves pinpointing a specific set of facts that resist metaphysical explanation. Certain identity and distinctness facts seem to constitute such a set. For example, we can imagine a scenario in which we have two qualitatively identical spheres, Castor and Pollux. Castor is distinct from Pollux but it is unclear what could metaphysically explain this distinctness fact. In this paper, I argue that we should not treat identity and distinctness facts as metaphysically fundamental. As such, identity and distinctness facts do not challenge the PSR. We can metaphysically explain them.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N