Short-Term Test–Retest Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Click-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Subjects.

Purpose: The objective of the current study was to investigate the short-term test–retest reliability of contralateral suppression (CS) of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) using commercially available otoacoustic emission equipment. Method: Twenty-three young normal-hearing subjects were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 64; no. 3; pp. 1062 - 1073
Autores principales: Keppler, Hannah, Degeest, Sofie, Vinck, Bart
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Mar2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=149385171&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 149385171
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2021
      vid: 64
      iid: 3
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        149385171
        10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00393
      ppf: 1062
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.5MB
      tig:
        atl: Short-Term Test–Retest Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Click-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Subjects.
      aug:
        au:
          Keppler, Hannah
          Degeest, Sofie
          Vinck, Bart
        affil:
          Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
          Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
      su:
        Hearing
        Analysis of variance
        Diagnostic equipment
        Statistical reliability
        Otoscopy
        Otoacoustic emissions
        Audiometry
        Data analysis
        Data analysis software
      sug:
        subj:
          Hearing
          Analysis of variance
          Medical, Dental, and Hospital Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers
          Professional machinery, equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers
          Diagnostic equipment
          Statistical reliability
          Otoscopy
          Otoacoustic emissions
          Audiometry
          Data analysis
          Data analysis software
      ab: Purpose: The objective of the current study was to investigate the short-term test–retest reliability of contralateral suppression (CS) of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) using commercially available otoacoustic emission equipment. Method: Twenty-three young normal-hearing subjects were tested. An otoscopic evaluation, admittance measures, pure-tone audiometry, measurements of CEOAEs without and with contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) to determine CS were performed at baseline (n = 23), an immediate retest without and with refitting of the probe (only CS of CEOAEs; n = 11), and a retest after 1 week (n = 23) were performed. Test–retest reliability parameters were determined on CEOAE response amplitudes without and with CAS, and on raw and normalized CS indices between baseline and the other test moments. Results: Repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated no random or systematic changes in CEOAE response amplitudes without and with CAS, and in raw and normalized CS indices between the test moments. Moderate-to-high intraclass correlation coefficients with mostly high significant between-subjects variability between baseline and each consecutive test moment were found for CEOAE response amplitude without and with CAS, and for the raw and normalized CS indices. Other reliability parameters deteriorated between CEOAE response amplitudes with CAS as compared to without CAS, between baseline and retest with probe refitting, and after 1 week, as well as for frequency-specific raw and normalized CS indices as compared to global CS indices. Conclusions: There was considerable variability in raw and normalized CS indices as measured using CEOAEs with CAS using commercially available otoacoustic emission equipment. More research is needed to optimize the measurement of CS of CEOAEs and to reduce influencing factors, as well as to make generalization of test–retest reliability data possible.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N