The Structure of Bias.

What is a bias? Standard philosophical views of both implicit and explicit bias focus this question on the representations one harbours, for example, stereotypes or implicit attitudes, rather than the ways in which those representations (or other mental states) are manipulated. I call this approach...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mind (0026-4423) Vol. 129; no. 516; pp. 1193 - 1237
Main Author: Johnson, Gabbrielle M
Format: Article
Published: Oxford University Press / USA Oct2020
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=149475576&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 149475576
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00264423
        MND
      jtl: Mind (0026-4423)
      issn: 00264423
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2020
      vid: 129
      iid: 516
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        149475576
        10.1093/mind/fzaa011
      ppf: 1193
      ppct: 44
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 384KB
      tig:
        atl: The Structure of Bias.
      aug:
        au: Johnson, Gabbrielle M
        affil: New York University
      su:
        Differentiation (Sociology)
        Discrimination (Sociology)
        Prejudices
        Representation (Philosophy)
        Philosophy
      sug:
        subj:
          Differentiation (Sociology)
          Discrimination (Sociology)
          Prejudices
          Representation (Philosophy)
          Philosophy
      ab: What is a bias? Standard philosophical views of both implicit and explicit bias focus this question on the representations one harbours, for example, stereotypes or implicit attitudes, rather than the ways in which those representations (or other mental states) are manipulated. I call this approach representationalism. In this paper, I argue that representationalism taken as a general theory of psychological social bias is a mistake, because it conceptualizes bias in ways that do not fully capture the phenomenon. Crucially, this view fails to capture a heretofore neglected possibility of bias, one that influences an individual's beliefs about or actions toward others, but is, nevertheless, nowhere represented in that individual's cognitive repertoire. In place of representationalism, I develop a functional account of psychological social bias which characterizes it as a mental entity that takes propositional mental states as inputs and returns propositional mental states as outputs in a way that instantiates social-kind inductions. This functional characterization leaves open which mental states and processes bridge the gap between the inputs and outputs, ultimately highlighting the diversity of candidates that can serve this role.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: © 2019 Mind Association.
      item: Mind (0026-4423)
      holder: Oxford University Press / USA
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N