Broad Agreement, But Notes of Caution With the Implications of Sakaluk's (2020) Critique of Wisman and Shrira (2020).

The authors offer a response to critiques by J. K. Sakaluk on studies by A. Wisman and I. Shrira from which they concluded men could detect olfactory signals of women's sexual arousal. Topics discussed include the small sample sizes used in the study, ways to compute effect sizes, and the magnitude...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:	Archives of Sexual Behavior Vol. 50; no. 3; pp. 773 - 778
Autores principales:	McCarthy, Randy J., Erickson, Jennifer M., Hu, Xinyu, Pawirosetiko, Joy S., Tarleton, Hannah L., Thomas, Courtney L., Tillery, Morgan G., Sagarin, Brad J.
Formato:	Artículo
Publicado:	Springer Nature Apr2021
Materias:	Sexual excitement Attitudes toward sex Human sexuality Sample size (Statistics) Effect sizes (Statistics)
Acceso en línea:	Ver este registro en EBSCOhost

Descripción
Sumario:	The authors offer a response to critiques by J. K. Sakaluk on studies by A. Wisman and I. Shrira from which they concluded men could detect olfactory signals of women's sexual arousal. Topics discussed include the small sample sizes used in the study, ways to compute effect sizes, and the magnitude of an effect for a phenomenon observed in an artificial laboratory setting.