Contribution of dietary snacking behaviours to discretionary energy intake and anthropometric measures in Australian adults: A comparison using an objective vs subjective definition for snacking.

Aim: There is limited information on the snacking behaviour of Australian adults, and the role of snacking in the diet may depend on how it is defined. This study aimed to compare the dietary snacking behaviours and associated nutritional intake and body composition in Australian adults, using an ob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Nutrition & Dietetics Vol. 78; no. 2; pp. 154 - 165
Autores principales: Fayet‐Moore, Flavia, McConnell, Andrew, Petocz, Peter, Cassettari, Tim, Tuck, Kate, Blumfield, Michelle, Warner, Molly, Marshall, Skye
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=149785245&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 149785245
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14466368
        QMK
      jtl: Nutrition & Dietetics
      issn: 14466368
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2021
      vid: 78
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        149785245
        146799393
        149785245
        149785245
        10.1111/1747-0080.12648
        149785245
      ppf: 154
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Contribution of dietary snacking behaviours to discretionary energy intake and anthropometric measures in Australian adults: A comparison using an objective vs subjective definition for snacking.
      aug:
        au:
          Fayet‐Moore, Flavia
          McConnell, Andrew
          Petocz, Peter
          Cassettari, Tim
          Tuck, Kate
          Blumfield, Michelle
          Warner, Molly
          Marshall, Skye
        affil: Nutrition Research Australia, Sydney New South Wales,, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Snacks
          Nutrition
          Body Composition Evaluation
          Food Intake Evaluation
          Australia
          Human
          Adult
          Nomenclature
          Questionnaires
          Self Report
          Descriptive Statistics
          Body Mass Index
          Anthropometry
          Male
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Data Analysis Software
          Analysis of Variance
          Chi Square Test
          Post Hoc Analysis
          T-Tests
          Confidence Intervals
          Time Factors
          Sex Factors
          Energy Intake
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
      ab: Aim: There is limited information on the snacking behaviour of Australian adults, and the role of snacking in the diet may depend on how it is defined. This study aimed to compare the dietary snacking behaviours and associated nutritional intake and body composition in Australian adults, using an objective vs a subjective definition for snacking. Methods: Cross‐sectional data were analysed from the 2011 to 2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 8361, 19+ years). Objective snacking was defined based on time of day between main meals. Subjective snacking was self‐reported by participants. Results: Using the objective definition, 88.2% of adults were snack consumers; where snacking contributed 20.0% (SD 20.0%) of total daily energy intake and 27.0% (SD 31.4%) of total daily discretionary energy. 41.3% (SD 37.1%) of snacking energy intake came from discretionary foods. Using the subjective definition, 98.5% of adults were snack consumers, where discretionary foods contributed 52.6% (SD 35.2%) of all snacking energy. The proportion of objective and subjective snacking energy from discretionary foods did not differ across body mass index groups. Conclusions: Objective snacking energy contributed more to core food groups than discretionary, was not associated with anthropometric measures, and contributed less to total discretionary energy than the evening meal. When snacking was defined subjectively, more than half of snacking energy was discretionary, suggesting that adults are more likely to perceive discretionary foods as snacks. Differences between snacking definitions means that associations between self‐reported snacking and diet or health outcomes, should be interpreted with caution.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N