WHY THE READINESS POTENTIAL DOES NOT DISPROVE FREE WILL.

Neuroscientist Benjamin Libet has conducted a series of experiments that reveal the existence of certain neural processes in the brain of human subjects, initiating an action prior to the human subject's intention to act, thus seemingly threatening our idea of free will. The purpose of this paper is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Stance (1943-1880) Vol. 14; pp. 124 - 133
Autor principal: TOTLAND, EVEN
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Ball State Innovation Corporation Apr2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Neuroscientist Benjamin Libet has conducted a series of experiments that reveal the existence of certain neural processes in the brain of human subjects, initiating an action prior to the human subject's intention to act, thus seemingly threatening our idea of free will. The purpose of this paper is to show how these processes do not disprove any idea of free will one might have as one would, if accepting such a thesis, be committing two distinct mereological fallacies and ultimately, would treat the human subject as inhabiting some of its parts as opposed to being the sum of its parts.