Investigating Adolescent Discourse in Critical Thinking: Monologic Responses to Stories Containing a Moral Dilemma.

Purpose: The adolescent developmental task of establishing autonomy from parents is supported through various aspects of executive functioning, including critical thinking. Our aim was to investigate younger and older adolescent language performance in form, content, and use in response to a moral d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools Vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 630 - 644
Autores principales: Wallis, Adele K., Westerveld, Marleen F., Waters, Allison M., Snow, Pamela C.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Apr2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=149934150&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 149934150
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01611461
        LSH
      jtl: Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools
      issn: 01611461
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2021
      vid: 52
      iid: 2
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
      place: Rockville, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        149934150
        149934150
        149934150
        10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00134
        149934150
      ppf: 630
      ppct: 14
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Investigating Adolescent Discourse in Critical Thinking: Monologic Responses to Stories Containing a Moral Dilemma.
      aug:
        au:
          Wallis, Adele K.
          Westerveld, Marleen F.
          Waters, Allison M.
          Snow, Pamela C.
        affil: Child and Youth Mental Health Services, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Critical Thinking
          Speech and Language Assessment
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Adolescent Development
          Discourse Analysis
          Human
          Storytelling
          Morals
          Grammar
          Semantics
          Bloom Syndrome
          Age Factors
          Communication Skills
          Autonomy
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Language Development
          Descriptive Statistics
          Australia
          Paired T-Tests
          Unpaired T-Tests
          Multivariate Analysis of Covariance
          Funding Source
      ab: Purpose: The adolescent developmental task of establishing autonomy from parents is supported through various aspects of executive functioning, including critical thinking. Our aim was to investigate younger and older adolescent language performance in form, content, and use in response to a moral dilemma task. Method: Forty-four typically developing adolescents completed a language sampling task, responding to stories that contained a moral dilemma for one of the characters. Two age groups participated: younger adolescents (n = 24, 12;2-13;11 [years; months]) and older adolescents (n = 20, 16;1-17;11). Participants produced a monologue in response to an open-ended question prompt. Responses were transcribed and analyzed for discourse production on measures of form (verbal productivity and syntactic complexity) and content (semantic diversity and word percentages in three semantic domains: affective, social, and cognitive). Language use was evaluated using a coding system based on Bloom's revised taxonomy of thinking. Results: There were no significant group differences in performance on measures of syntactic complexity and semantic diversity. Significant differences were found in adolescents' language using Bloom's revised taxonomy. The younger adolescents demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of utterances at Level 1 (remembering and understanding) compared to older adolescents, while the older age group produced a higher proportion at Level 3 (evaluating and creating). Conclusions: The moral dilemma task was effective in demonstrating the growth of adolescent language skills in use of language for critical thinking. The results highlight the clinical utility of the moral dilemma task in engaging adolescents in discourse involving critical thinking, whereas the associated coding scheme, based on Bloom's revised taxonomy of thinking, may differentiate levels of critical thinking and provide direction for intervention.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N