Whole‐life embodied carbon in multistory buildings: Steel, concrete and timber structures.

Buildings and the construction industry are top contributors to climate change, and structures account for the largest share of the upfront greenhouse gas emissions. While a body of research exists into such emissions, a systematic comparison of multiple building structures in steel, concrete, and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Industrial Ecology Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 403 - 419
Autores principales: Hart, Jim, D'Amico, Bernardino, Pomponi, Francesco
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=150065441&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 150065441
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10881980
        FL1
      jtl: Journal of Industrial Ecology
      issn: 10881980
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2021
      vid: 25
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        150065441
        10.1111/jiec.13139
      ppf: 403
      ppct: 16
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Whole‐life embodied carbon in multistory buildings: Steel, concrete and timber structures.
      aug:
        au:
          Hart, Jim
          D'Amico, Bernardino
          Pomponi, Francesco
        affil: REBEL (Resource Efficient Built Environment Lab), School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
      su:
        Steel buildings
        Steel framing
        Tall buildings
        Timber
        Probability density function
        Concrete
        Steel walls
      sug:
        subj:
          Ready-Mix Concrete Manufacturing
          All Other Miscellaneous Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing
          Timber Tract Operations
          Wood Preservation
          Sawmills (except shingle and shake mills)
          Logging
          Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers
          Logging (except contract)
          Framing Contractors
          Steel buildings
          Steel framing
          Tall buildings
          Timber
          Probability density function
          Concrete
          Steel walls
      keyword:
        building structures
        construction
        cross‐laminated timber (CLT)
        embodied carbon
        life cycle assessment (LCA)
        material efficiency
        building structures
        construction
        cross‐laminated timber (CLT)
        embodied carbon
        life cycle assessment (LCA)
        material efficiency
      ab: Buildings and the construction industry are top contributors to climate change, and structures account for the largest share of the upfront greenhouse gas emissions. While a body of research exists into such emissions, a systematic comparison of multiple building structures in steel, concrete, and timber alternatives is missing. In this article, comparisons are made between mass and whole‐life embodied carbon (WLEC) emissions of building superstructures using identical frame configurations in steel, reinforced concrete, and engineered timber frames. These are assessed and compared for 127 different frame configurations, from 2 to 19 stories. Embodied carbon coefficients for each material and life cycle stage are represented by probability density functions to capture the uncertainty inherent in life cycle assessment. Normalized results show clear differences between the masses of the three structural typologies, with the concrete frame approximately five times the mass of the timber frame, and 50% higher than the steel frame. The WLEC emissions are mainly governed by the upfront emissions (cradle to practical completion), but subsequent emissions are still significant—particularly in the case of timber for which 36% of emissions, on average, occur post‐construction. Results for WLEC are more closely grouped than for masses, with median values for the timber frame, concrete frame, and steel frame of 119, 185, and 228 kgCO2e/m2, respectively. Despite the advantage for timber in this comparison, there is overlap between the results distributions, meaning that close attention to efficient design and procurement is essential. This article met the requirements for a gold–gold JIE data openness badge described in http://jie.click/badges.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N