Prone Positioning in Spontaneously Breathing Subjects With Moderate or Severe ARDS During Invasive Ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Prone positioning (PP) during invasive mechanical ventilation improves outcomes of patients with severe ARDS. Recent studies suggest that PP in spontaneously breathing, nonintubated patients with acute respiratory failure is well tolerated and improves oxygenation. However, little is kno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 66; no. 5; pp. 724 - 733
Autores principales: Wiart, Adil, Castanares-Zapatero, Diego, Wittebole, Xavier, Maerckx, Guillaume, David, Guillaume, Laterre, Pierre-Francois, Gerard, Ludovic
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. May2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=150127053&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 150127053
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2021
      vid: 66
      iid: 5
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        150127053
        150127053
        150127053
        10.4187/respcare.08461
        150127053
      ppf: 724
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Prone Positioning in Spontaneously Breathing Subjects With Moderate or Severe ARDS During Invasive Ventilation.
      aug:
        au:
          Wiart, Adil
          Castanares-Zapatero, Diego
          Wittebole, Xavier
          Maerckx, Guillaume
          David, Guillaume
          Laterre, Pierre-Francois
          Gerard, Ludovic
        affil: Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
      sug:
        subj:
          Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute Therapy
          Respiration, Artificial Methods
          Respiration
          Prone Position
          Life Experiences
          Attitude of Health Personnel
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Intubation, Intratracheal
          Retrospective Design
          Record Review
          Treatment Outcomes Evaluation
          Severity of Illness
          COVID-19
          Intensive Care Units
          Belgium
          Oxygen Saturation
          Arteries
          Descriptive Statistics
          Tertiary Health Care
          Electronic Health Records
          APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation)
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Scales
          Adverse Health Care Event
          Data Analysis Software
          Unpaired T-Tests
          Chi Square Test
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Paired T-Tests
          Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: BACKGROUND: Prone positioning (PP) during invasive mechanical ventilation improves outcomes of patients with severe ARDS. Recent studies suggest that PP in spontaneously breathing, nonintubated patients with acute respiratory failure is well tolerated and improves oxygenation. However, little is known regarding patient triggered ventilation in intubated patients with ARDS undergoing PP. We conducted a retrospective review of our experience with placing patients in the prone position in 2 cohorts of subjects with moderate and severe ARDS (ie, one cohort with ARDS related to COVID-19, the other with ARDS unrelated to COVID-19), many of whom were receiving pressure support ventilation (PSV). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis in a single 22-bed mixed ICU. The subjects included in the analysis were ≥ 18 y old, met the Berlin definition for moderate or severe ARDS (whether related COVID-19 or not), and underwent PP during invasive ventilation. RESULTS: 39 subjects were included in the analysis: 20 subjects had ARDS related to COVID-19, while 19 had ARDS related to other etiologies. A total of 113 PP episodes were analyzed: 84 during PSV and 29 during volume control continuous mandatory ventilation. PP during PSV was well tolerated and was effective in improving arterial oxygenation (ie, an increase of median PaO2 /FIO2 from 100 mm Hg [interquartile range 75-120] before PP to 135 mm Hg [interquartile range 111-161] at the end of the PP session, P < .0001). No significant difference between continuous mandatory ventilation and PSV was noted regarding arterial oxygenation during PP. Compared with continuous mandatory ventilation mode, PP during PSV was associated with a significant decrease in the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (4% vs 69% of subjects, P < .001), while sedative requirements remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of consecutive intubated subjects with moderate or severe ARDS, related or not to COVID-19, spontaneous breathing during PP was well tolerated and achieved significant improvement in arterial oxygenation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N