Coincidence and reproducibility in the EHT black hole experiment.

This paper discusses some philosophical aspects related to the recent publication of the experimental results of the 2017 black hole experiment, namely the first image of the supermassive black hole at the center of galaxy M87. In this paper I present a philosophical analysis of the 2017 Event Horiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Studies in History & Philosophy of Science Part A Vol. 85; pp. 63 - 79
Autor principal: Weinstein, Galina
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Feb2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=150170815&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 150170815
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00393681
        HPS
      jtl: Studies in History & Philosophy of Science Part A
      issn: 00393681
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2021
      vid: 85
      pid: 2410
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        150170815
        10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.09.007
      ppf: 63
      ppct: 16
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Coincidence and reproducibility in the EHT black hole experiment.
      aug:
        au: Weinstein, Galina
        affil:
          The Department of Philosophy, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Hushi Ave., Mount Carmel, 3498838, Haifa, Israel
          The Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Kanfei Nesharim, Herzliya, 46150, Israel
      su:
        Black holes
        Coincidence
        Laboratories
        Mass measurement
        Machine learning
      sug:
        subj:
          Black holes
          Coincidence
          Laboratories
          Mass measurement
          Machine learning
      keyword:
        Black hole
        Computer simulation
        Event horizon telescope
        General relativity
        Philosophy of experimentation
      ab: This paper discusses some philosophical aspects related to the recent publication of the experimental results of the 2017 black hole experiment, namely the first image of the supermassive black hole at the center of galaxy M87. In this paper I present a philosophical analysis of the 2017 Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) black hole experiment. I first present Hacking's philosophy of experimentation. Hacking gives his taxonomy of elements of laboratory science and distinguishes a list of elements. I show that the EHT experiment conforms to major elements from Hacking's list. I then describe with the help of Galison's Philosophy of the Shadow how the EHT Collaboration created the famous black hole image. Galison outlines three stages for the reconstruction of the black hole image: Socio-Epistemology, Mechanical Objectivity, after which there is an additional Socio-Epistemology stage. I subsequently present my own interpretation of the reconstruction of the black hole image and I discuss model fitting to data. I suggest that the main method used by the EHT Collaboration to assure trust in the results of the EHT experiment is what philosophers call the Argument from Coincidence. I show that using this method for the above purpose is problematic. I present two versions of the Argument from Coincidence: Hacking's Coincidence and Cartwright's Reproducibility by which I analyse the EHT experiment. The same estimation of the mass of the black hole is reproduced in four different procedures. The EHT Collaboration concludes: the value we have converged upon is robust. I analyse the mass measurements of the black hole with the help of Cartwright's notion of robustness. I show that the EHT Collaboration construe Coincidence/Reproducibility as Technological Agnosticism and I contrast this interpretation with van Fraassen's scientific agnosticism. • First image of a black hole obtained by the Event Horizon Telescope. • A new type of experiment and Cartwright's interpretation of reproducibility. • The paper discusses Galison's philosophy, machine learning and computer simulation. • Hacking's elements of laboratory science and the argument from coincidence. • The EHT experiment and van Fraassen's empiricism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N